Middle School | Formative Assessment Probe
By Page Keeley
Assessment Physical Science Middle School
This is the new updated edition of the first book in the bestselling Uncovering Student Ideas in Science series. Like the first edition of volume 1, this book helps pinpoint what your students know (or think they know) so you can monitor their learning and adjust your teaching accordingly. Loaded with classroom-friendly features you can use immediately, the book includes 25 “probes”—brief, easily administered formative assessments designed to understand your students’ thinking about 60 core science concepts.
The purpose of this assessment probe is to elicit students’ ideas about falling objects. The probe is designed to find out if students think the weight or mass of an object affects how fast it falls.
P-E-O
acceleration, force, gravity, mass
Prediction D is the best answer: All three balls will hit the floor at about the same time. The word about is used because the balls are not dropped in a perfect vacuum. In general, freely falling objects increase their speed at the same rate, 9.8 m/s each second, regardless of their mass. Ball 3 has more mass than the other two balls. Because of this, some students reason that if all three balls are dropped at the same time, the heaviest ball (ball 3) should reach the ground first. This is a seemingly logical conclusion, but it actually hits the floor at the same time as the lighter balls due to the way forces affect the motion of objects.
Objects with more mass accelerate more slowly than objects with less mass, if pushed or pulled with equal force. This phenomenon is clear to anyone who has pushed a very heavy object in order to start it moving. If you could push an object with the same constant force every time, you would actually find that an object with twice the mass speeds up exactly half as quickly. On the other hand, if you pushed twice as hard on any given object, the object would speed up twice as quickly.
This same effect applies to falling objects like balls. At first thought, it would seem that the stronger gravitational force on the metal ball should speed it up more quickly. In fact, the stronger pull on this ball is canceled out by the extra effort required to speed up this more massive ball. If Reggie decided to drop a ball that had five times more mass than ball 3, the force pulling the ball downward would be five times greater, but the ball would also be five times more difficult to speed up. As a result, this very heavy ball would speed up equally quickly and hit the ground at the same time as ball 1, 2, or 3. The rate at which free-falling objects fall is 9.8 m/s/s, regardless of their mass.
However, because the balls are falling through the air, the air exerts an upward force on them as they fall. This force can differ depending on an object’s size, density, and speed. Because of this force, objects dropped together in an experiment will not hit the ground at the same time if air resistance is a factor. For example, if a Ping-Pong ball with a mass of 2.7 g were dropped with the three balls in the probe, it would not hit the ground at the same time as the other three because air resistance would be a significant factor. If a sheet of paper and a book were dropped at the same time from the same height, the book would land first because air resistance cannot be ignored with the sheet of paper. This probe assumes that the effect of air resistance on the balls is negligible. If the air could be removed and the balls dropped in a vacuum, they would always hit the ground at exactly the same time.
Elementary Students
In the elementary school grades, students observe that things fall when dropped and later relate this to Earth’s gravitational pull. They observe how different objects fall and that they can change how fast an object falls by changing its shape. At this stage, their investigations of the motion of falling objects are primarily observational.
Middle School Students
In the middle school grades, students engage in concrete experiences involving force and motion from which a more comprehensive understanding of force and motion can be developed later in high school. Students observe the effects of different forces on falling, rolling, and sliding objects and begin to move from qualitative descriptions to quantitative ones.
High School Students
Students at the high school level move from understanding gravity as a general universal force to understanding more of the details and mathematical description of gravitational forces. At this level, students are better able to engage in the more abstract thinking involved with mathematical representations, such as the acceleration of a falling object, and also to learn of the many contexts in which gravity plays an important role. High school students are also able to move from qualitative descriptions of motion toward quantitative ones and should be encouraged to do so (AAAS 1993). Before launching into applications of mathematical formulae, students should demonstrate the ability to describe the subtleties involved in changing motion. By learning mathematical descriptions and specific terminology associated with motion concepts (velocity, acceleration, etc.) and after acquiring a broad foundation of firsthand experiences observing and describing motion, students can use vocabulary and calculations with meaning. At this grade level the concept of force is better understood but students’ intuitive ideas about the effects of forces on objects are still tenacious.
Show students a wooden ball, golf ball, and similarly sized metal ball and have them hold them to feel their “felt weight” (or show three other similarly shaped objects of different masses). Make sure that students know that the balls will be released at exactly the same time, from exactly the same height.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2001. Atlas of science literacy. Vol. 1, “laws of motion,” 62–63. New York: Oxford University Press.
Driver, R., A. Squires, P. Rushworth, and V. Wood- Robinson. 1994. Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Keeley, P. 2005. Science curriculum topic study: Bridging the gap between standards and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nelson, G. 2004. Science 101: What is gravity? Science and Children (Sep.): 22–23.
Robertson, W. 2002. Force and motion, Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.