Elementary | Formative Assessment Probe
By Page Keeley
Assessment Physical Science Elementary Grade 3
This is the new updated edition of the first book in the bestselling Uncovering Student Ideas in Science series. Like the first edition of volume 1, this book helps pinpoint what your students know (or think they know) so you can monitor their learning and adjust your teaching accordingly. Loaded with classroom-friendly features you can use immediately, the book includes 25 “probes”—brief, easily administered formative assessments designed to understand your students’ thinking about 60 core science concepts.
The purpose of this assessment probe is to elicit students’ ideas about circular motion. The probe is designed to determine whether students recognize that an object will move in a straight line unless acted upon by an outside force.
Friendly Talk
circular motion, force, inertia, Newton’s first law
The best answer is Keira’s: The marble leaving the track will travel in a straight line. This behavior is true of all objects: If no outside forces act on an object, the object will travel in a straight line at a constant speed. As the marble rolls down the marble tower’s spiral track, a force toward the center of the spiral (a centripetal force) caused by the outside wall keeps the marble rolling in a spiral path. When the marble leaves the end of the track, it is no longer in contact with the walls of the track. Without the track pushing on it, the marble no longer has a center-directed force acting on it that causes it to roll in a curved path. According to Newton’s first law, an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Since there is no longer a center-directed, external force exerted by the walls of the circular track pushing on the marble, the marble rolls off the end of the track in a straight-line path across the floor. It will continue to do so until an outside force causes it either to change direction or slow down and stop.
Elementary Students
Students at the elementary school level may have played with curved marble towers and winding chutes or toy cars moving down curved tracks. Even though their observations may show that a moving object leaves a curved path in a straight line, students tend to revert to their intuitions that an object will continue to move in a curved path. At this level, their experiences are observational, forming a foundation to later develop explanations in middle school that are based on Newton’s laws.
Middle School Students
Force and motion relationships are developed more fully at the middle school level. Students learn about Newton’s first law of motion and a variety of phenomena that can be explained by it. The idea of inertia is conceptually developed at this level. Students have various experiences observing and explaining a variety of motions, including circular motion.
High School Students
Students build on their previous experience with Newton’s first law at the high school level, adding mathematical relationships to their understandings. As they move from qualitative to quantitative views of forces and motion, students begin to understand the mathematical consequences that lead to Newton’s laws of motion. Students are now able to use Newton’s second law to solve circular motion scenarios from new perspectives and make quantitative predictions with confidence. However, this ability to perform mathematical operations should not be overemphasized in place of conceptual understanding. Students still strongly retain many incorrect ideas about circular motion, and being able to perform mathematical calculations or restate Newton’s laws from memory is not a certain indication of understanding.
Make sure that students understand what is meant by “a spirally curving marble track.” Consider bringing in a prop, such as a child’s curved marble tower or a winding car track, or curved tube, such as a hose or flexible pipe, so that students understand the context of the probe. The prop can then be used to test students’ predictions after they commit to an outcome.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2001. Atlas of science literacy. Vol. 1, “laws of motion map,” 62–63. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keeley, P. 2005. Science curriculum topic study: Bridging the gap between standards and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Robertson, W. 2002. Force and motion, Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Stein, M. 1998. Toying with science. Science and Children (Sept.): 35–39.
Harris, J. 2004. Science 101: Are there different types of force and motion? Science and Children (Mar.): 19.