By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2007-11-15
I’ve described a few components of the SciLinks rubric so far: the accuracy and appropriateness of the content, the credentials of the sites owner/author/sponsor, and “interactivity.” The overall design or “look” of a page or website is an important part of the review process for including a website in SciLinks. Whether the site is a single page or a connected set of pages, the arrangement of text and graphics will be what compels someone to read the page.
We’ve all seen sites whose design is visually appealing. These sites use spacing to set off the text, making it easier to read. The text is chunked into paragraphs or smaller segments, and the colors of the text and background do not clash. The graphics and animations are of high quality and are integral to the content, not just decorative. Multimedia components such as video clips or podcasts add value to the site. Annoying or distracting sound effects are minimal, and popups and advertising are not included (or are kept to a minimum). A menu, index, or arrows help the user to navigate through the site. Here are several examples of well-designed sites in SciLinks:
Not everything that is on the World Wide Web is meant for the whole world! Lecture notes, class assignments, and PowerPoint slides are often made available to students in classes. These may or may not be appropriate and useful for the rest of us, especially if they refer to a particular textbook or specific class activities. These often are text-based and generic in design. However, for some topics, especially advanced ones, these class notes or text pages may be the only informational sites available.