Student-Centered Learning in an Earth Science, Preservice, Teacher-Education Course
In an effort to get elementary teachers to teach more science in the classroom, a required preservice science education course was designed to promote the use of hands-on teaching techniques. This paper describes course content and activities for an innovative, student-centered, Earth science class. However, any science-content course could be adapted in a similar manner to include more student-centered activities.
In an effort to get elementary teachers to teach more science in the classroom, a required preservice science education course was designed to promote the use of hands-on teaching techniques. This paper describes course content and activities for an innovative, student-centered, Earth science class. However, any science-content course could be adapted in a similar manner to include more student-centered activities.
In an effort to get elementary teachers to teach more science in the classroom, a required preservice science education course was designed to promote the use of hands-on teaching techniques. This paper describes course content and activities for an innovative, student-centered, Earth science class. However, any science-content course could be adapted in a similar manner to include more student-centered activities.
Science Sampler: Classroom management, rules, consequences, and rewards! Oh, my!
Staying up-to-date on professional issues
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2009-06-30
I subscribe to many blogs and other RSS feeds to try to stay up-to-date. In a previous post, I noted how RSS feeds from organizations such as NASA, Scientific American, and the National Science Foundation provide summaries of current issues and interesting topics in science.
There are many other resources that can give us up-to-date information on issues related to teaching and learning. I particularly like the Inside School Research blog from Education Week. It includes brief summaries of current research with a link to the full report or study. Recent topics include independent-study schools, teacher mobility, the value of frequent quizzes, cell phones in the classroom, and value-added measures.
I also like the ASCD (Association for Curriculum and Supervision) Inservice blog. Recent topics include Tracking “Makes You Feel Like You’re Not Smart”, Hypotheses: They’re Not Just for Science Anymore, Practice, Practice, Practice (Or: Homework, Homework, Homework?), Middle School Math and the Achievement Gap with links to reports or book chapters with more details.
I’ve also started to follow some interesting “tweets” on Twitter. Yes, I know that people post trivial and mundane information (I’m eating lunch. I’m at the beach.), but I’ve found some interesting folks to follow (e.g., NSTA’s Lab Out Loud guys) as well as organizations such as NSTA, ASCD, and the Cornell Lab of Ornithology that provide leads on interesting information. And I’ve started to tweet with some of my own “finds.”
Of course, you don’t have time to read everything, but when you can get summaries or abstracts to skim, you can pick and choose what is relevant.
Please share any of your favorites!
I subscribe to many blogs and other RSS feeds to try to stay up-to-date. In a previous post, I noted how RSS feeds from organizations such as NASA, Scientific American, and the National Science Foundation provide summaries of current issues and interesting topics in science.
The featured technologies range from the easy to master (such as digital cameras) to the more complex (such as Probeware and geographic information systems). Among the chapter topics:
The featured technologies range from the easy to master (such as digital cameras) to the more complex (such as Probeware and geographic information systems). Among the chapter topics:
The book is designed so you can easily dip in and out of the topics you want. It’s organized into four sections:
1. Principles and practices that science and English teaching share
The book is designed so you can easily dip in and out of the topics you want. It’s organized into four sections:
1. Principles and practices that science and English teaching share
Start With A Story is a collection of more than 40 essays published primarily as columns in NSTA’s member publication, Journal of College Science Teaching. The collection examines every aspect of the case study method.
Start With A Story is a collection of more than 40 essays published primarily as columns in NSTA’s member publication, Journal of College Science Teaching. The collection examines every aspect of the case study method.
Critical science "skills"
By MsMentorAdmin
Posted on 2009-06-27
—Niki, Baltimore, Maryland
In science department meetings, we often agonize over what and how much content to “cover.” We lament that students don’t seem to remember much content from one year or subject to the next. Inquiry and in-depth study often take a back seat to presenting content that will be on a final exam or state test.
When identifying skills critical to science, I wonder if we should include traditional skills such as balancing equations, calculating answers to problems, measuring, or memorizing definitions? Communications and mathematics are certainly critical in science, but they should be put in context. Most of us as adults read for a purpose such as entertainment or information. Most of our writing is purposeful, too: memos, reports, logs, journals, self-expression. Few of us do arithmetic calculations without a specific purpose (although I am addicted to KenKen puzzles).
One of my favorite quotations (often attributed to Albert Einstein) is “Education is what’s left after you’ve forgotten everything.” In other words, even though we might not remember everything, we take basic experiences from a learning environment with us into new situations. When I switched from teaching middle to high school, the principal asked about my philosophy of learning. I had never written any formal document, so I listed the “big picture” skills I wanted my students to take away from my classes. I also posted these in my classroom, discussing them with the students:
- Problem solving: Not in the sense of the problems at the end of the chapter or “problems” such as global warming or pandemic diseases, but the ability to work through a situation by asking questions, defining problems, investigating, engaging in inquiry, observing, finding and evaluating information, communicating (both verbally and graphically), and active listening.
- Risk-taking: We need to get students out of their intellectual comfort zones and try something where the answers may not be known ahead of time, if at all.
- Imagination/creativity: Kindergarten students are wonderful at this, and then we somehow program it out of students. We insist they do things exactly as we tell them to do, or we give students a template (a good thing to start with), then never allow them to deviate from it or customize it to their own learning.
- Dedication: It’s easy for students to be distracted, but seeing a task through to completion, knowing one’s strengths, working on one’s weaknesses, and striving for more than mediocrity are real boosts to self-esteem—even better than someone saying “good job.”
- Enthusiasm (my students preferred the word enjoyment, which was fine with me): Learning is interesting and it’s part of what makes us human. Not all learning experiences are necessarily “fun,” but good teachers can make any topic interesting by showing their own passion and through engaging classroom activities.
Lifelong and independent learning beyond the classroom is based on these skills. We have to realize that not all students will pursue a science-related career or even have the same passion for the subject we have. But they will be voters, taxpayers, parents, employees, business owners, travelers, professionals, and hobbyists who will need not only basic content knowledge but also the skills to be lifelong learners in science-related issues. How many of our schools’ mission statements contain that phrase? What are we doing to make sure this happens?
—Niki, Baltimore, Maryland
In science department meetings, we often agonize over what and how much content to “cover.” We lament that students don’t seem to remember much content from one year or subject to the next. Inquiry and in-depth study often take a back seat to presenting content that will be on a final exam or state test.