Skip to main content

Volume 1, Issue 10

Serving Youth With Special Needs

Volume 1, Issue 10

Serving Youth With Special Needs

Volume 1, Issue 10

Serving Youth With Special Needs

 

PASCO Wireless Pressure Sensor

By Edwin P. Christmann

Posted on 2019-04-25

Introduction:

The PASCO Wireless Pressure sensor is easy to use and connects via Bluetooth to the user’s cell phone or to another electronic device, e.g., IPad. The sensor has a range of 0-400 kilopascals (kPa)- with its most accurate reported measurements reported over 20 kPa. Prior to using the sensor, users must charge it with a micro USB charging cable. Subsequently, the micro USB end of the cable is inserted into the sensor and the USB end of the cable is inserted into a USB port (e.g., the USB port of a computer) for approximately 3 hours. According to the website description of the product (which can be found at https://www.pasco.com/prodCatalog/PS/PS-3203_wireless-pressure-sensor/index.cfm ) the battery has an expected life of approximately 3-4 months with normal use after a full charge and the LED light blinks red to indicate to users that the battery is charging.

Image 1: A picture of the PASCO Wireless Pressure sensor.

Once the battery is fully charged, via a Bluetooth connection, users can open SPARKvue or PASCO Capstone to connect their device to the sensor. In order to connect the sensor via Bluetooth, users must first launch the PASCO data collection software, i.e, SPARKvue or PASCO Capstone. We selected SPARKvue which is compatible with Mac, Windows, iOS, Android, and Chromebooks. However, PASCO Capstone is compatible with Mac or Windows and is also easy to use.

Once the the PASCO data collection software is ready, users select the Bluetooth icon, and then select the device from the “Wireless Devices” list that matches the Device ID number on the bottom left portion of their sensor. The Bluetooth LED light blinks green to indicate that the device is connected via Bluetooth and can begin data collection!

Users then choose the “Start New Experiment” option, which has a two options: 1) build a new experiment or 2) open a saved experiment (see Image 2). We chose to open a PASCO experiment which is shown below in Image 3.

The experiment that we used came from the Essential Chemistry section, which is taken from the list of experiments shown in Image 4, i.e., 12B- Boyles Law, which is one of PASCO’s Essential Chemistry Investigations. Once users click on an experiment, a blank graph and table appears for users follow along with the instructions to complete a lab handout for data collection (see Image 5). The data appears in the table and is exported into a graph after data collection. Multiple runs of data can be collected, which is commensurate with the computation of descriptive statistics and inferences (see Image 6).

Image 2: A picture of the screen users see where they are prompted to select how they wish to continue their data collection.

Image 3: A picture of some of the subject choices users are provided with if they choose to open a PASCO experiment.

Image 4: A picture of some of the experiment choices in the Essential Chemistry category. Experiment 12B: Boyles Law is highlighted as this is the experiment we used to test the sensor.

Image 5: A picture of the empty graph users see when they first open the Boyle’s Law experiment.

Image 6: A picture of the completed data table and graph. The graph has the data from three different runs displayed so the data can be compared. Users can switch the data displayed in the table to be from Run 1, 2, or 3 by clicking on the boxes at the top left of the screen.

Classroom Use:

This device could be useful in science subjects such as chemistry and physics. For more information, visit the website description of this product (found at https://www.pasco.com/prodCatalog/PS/PS-3203_wireless-pressure-sensor/index.cfm). You will find examples of experiments and teacher guides that can be used in a variety of science courses. Resources are available for purchase and free experiments are available under the Training and Resources.

There are a multitude of different topics science teachers can use this sensor for. The pressure sensor could be used directly to verify Boyle’s Law. Hence, students can see the way that pressure and volume interact in a closed system. With the addition of a temperature sensor that was placed in an ice bath and then into boiling water, the sensor can be used to plot changes in pressure and volume for various scenarios including: constant pressure, volume, or temperature, and also for adiabatic scenarios. As a result, students can see the effects of manipulating variables and can see the physical and graphical representations of how heat engine at work in real time.

****************************

Mechanically, the sensor could be used with varying tubes/types of syringes to observe hydraulics and how we can use hydraulics to lift a car or break rock with heavy equipment. This extension would involve employing the various connectors and different diameter hoses. The science teacher is positioned to set up a sort of balance (scales of balance) to observe how a small amount of weight can lift a large amount of weight by varying the cross sectional area and thus changing the force to keep a constant pressure.

Students can use the sensor with the syringe and flat surface as a type of scale for measuring the weight of an object. The science teacher could have several of these scales denoted around the classroom to provide different stations where something new should be found at each. For example, one station might tell the students what the area is, and they will have to measure the weight of an object by multiplying the pressure and the respective area. Afterwards, students would place the object on the makeshift scale. Other stations may tell the students the weight of objects and ask for the area of the tube below the flat part of the scale. All these little experiments would culminate in students understanding the relationship between pressure, force, and area (P=F/A).

The syringe could be set up at the end of a cart track and students can try to design a cart to hit the syringe with as minimal forces as possible. This can be conceived through the car safety crash test dummies, or the ever-popular egg drop experiments in which students try to drop an egg without breaking it by building shock absorbing mechanisms and the like. The sensor would provide students a graphical image of the pressures that are involved during the collision (and therefore the forces) to determine which group had the “safest” cart.

Anything related to pressure can probably be rigged up with the device and some modifications to suit the need. But there are tons of applications with weather, fluid dynamics (e.g. Bernoulli’s Principle and how the pressure changes relative to the velocity of flow), ideal gases, engine heat cycles, hydraulics, and the physical definition of pressure as P=F/A.

A possible chemistry application utilizing this probe signals a classroom experience where students infer temperature and thus exothermic vs endothermic reactions. Many reactions will change the speed that they occur when they are in different pressure environments, and some reactions change the pressure of their surroundings when they are in a closed system. While other gauges (such as a temperature probe in this particular case), the extra step involved of manipulating a variable that at first glance appears to students to be completely unrelated will reinforce learning outcomes and meaning-making forged in critical thinking. (e.g. NGSS HS-PS1-4)

Specifications:
– Range
o 0-400 kPa (values under 20 kPa may not be reliable or accurate)
– Resolution
o 0.1 kPa
– Accuracy
o +/- 1 kPa
– Max Sample Rate
o 1000 samples per second via BLE or USB connection
– Battery
o Rechargeable Lithium-Polymer
o 3-4 month expected battery life per charge with normal use
– Logging
o Yes
– Connectivity
o Direct USB or via Bluetooth Smart (Bluetooth 4.0)
– Max Wireless Range
o 30 meters (unobstructed)

What’s Included:
– Pressure sensor
– 0.6 m of polyurethane tubing
– Double barbed tube connector
– Male barbed Luer lock connector (2)
– Female barbed Luer lock connector
– 60 cc syringe
– USB cable (for recharging and optional direct connection)

Cost:
$69 per device

Edwin P. Christmann is a professor and chairman of the secondary education department and graduate coordinator of the mathematics and science teaching program at Slippery Rock University in Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania. Emily Ferraro is a graduate student in the mathematics and science teaching program at Slippery Rock University in Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania.

Introduction:

 

NSTA Members to Vote on New Name

By Cindy Workosky

Posted on 2019-04-23

The NSTA Board of Directors took a bold step to usher in a new, exciting future for NSTA by voting in February in favor of changing the association’s name from the National Science Teachers Association to the National Science Teaching Association. The board believes this represents a major shift in NSTA’s vision to better connect with a science teaching community that has grown to include many who do not have the formal title of “teacher.”

According to NSTA bylaws, the proposed name change requires the approval of the NSTA membership. An electronic ballot will be e-mailed to all members on May 20. Voting closes on June 20 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Members who want to receive the ballot, but have opted out of receiving e-mails from NSTA should visit the My Account page  no later than May 2 and uncheck the opt out box. For answers to questions about opting out or about your membership status, send an e-mail to membership@nsta.org.

NSTA members can engage in a members-only community forum to connect with colleagues to share ideas, express opinions, and ask questions about the proposed name change. Visit www.nsta.org/namechange from April 11 through June 20 to join the conversation.

“The new name reflects a broader view of the science teaching community and the many places where science learning takes place,” said NSTA President Christine A. Royce. “We support all teachers—including those at the elementary level—as well as curriculum developers; science and STEM administrators; preservice educators; parents; youth science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) coordinators; museum educators; homeschoolers; and more. By bringing together all stakeholders, we are better able to advocate for science education.”

NSTA’s transformation includes more than a name change. The association is refocusing its programs, services, and products to be more collaborative, personal, interactive, and responsive.

Throughout the year, NSTA will unveil new ways it will support science teaching and learning with enhanced content, exciting new digital products, more personalized services, and dynamic resources ranging from the printed page to social media and virtual learning opportunities.

The association will launch a new website using technology in innovative ways to better meet the needs of the science teaching community. Efforts are also underway to make finding the right resources simple, easy, and user friendly and deliver targeted, personalized teaching content, including lesson plans and vetted grade-level, subject-specific resources. A new logo that reflects our new direction and vision will also be unveiled.

“The mission of NSTA is an important one,” said NSTA Executive Director David E. Evans. “Now, more than ever, we need to support excellence in science teaching and learning for all. We are excited about the new digital environment we are building that will allow all those involved in science teaching to better connect, collaborate, and grow professionally. At the same time, NSTA will continue to provide trusted, high-quality teaching resources and will continue our advocacy work in science so that all students will be prepared to succeed in the workplace and in society.”

This article originally appeared in the May 2019 issue of NSTA Reports, the member newspaper of the National Science Teachers Association. Each month, NSTA members receive NSTA Reports, featuring news on science education, the association, and more. Not a member? Learn how NSTA can help you become the best science teacher you can be.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon
 
 

The NSTA Board of Directors took a bold step to usher in a new, exciting future for NSTA by voting in February in favor of changing the association’s name from the National Science Teachers Association to the National Science Teaching Association. The board believes this represents a major shift in NSTA’s vision to better connect with a science teaching community that has grown to include many who do not have the formal title of “teacher.”

 

Ed News: Art Can Make Science Easier to Remember

By Kate Falk

Posted on 2019-04-19

News Roundup banner

This week in education news, new California bill could ban animal dissection from schools; using art in science class helped students retain what they learned longer; educators more likely to strike in lowest-paid districts and states; Wyoming State Board of Education reconsidering draft computer science standards; new science tests are rolling out across the country, but some teachers are worried that they will include a lot of questions on subjects their students haven’t studied; and a California legislator says new teachers with little training can’t adequately serve neediest students.

Should Animal Dissection Be Banned From Schools?

A new California bill, AB 1586, could ban animal dissection in K-12 classrooms throughout the state. The Replacing Animals in Science (RAISE) Act argues that animal dissection is costly, exposes participants to carcinogenic chemicals and is harmful to both animals and the environment. Among teachers, some argue that animal dissection can be an important learning experience that can either inspire or discourage students from pursuing a career in biology and cannot be replaced with any substitutes. Listen to the discussion featured on KPCC.

How Do We Get Middle School Students Excited About Science? Make It Hands-On

Eighth-grader Liam Bayne has always liked math and science — that’s one reason his family sent him to The Alternative School For Math and Science (ASMS). But he was surprised and excited when his sixth-grade science class started each new topic with experimentation, not lecture or textbook learning. At ASMS the teaching philosophy centers around giving students experiences that pique their interest to know more. Read the article featured in KQED.

Art Can Make Science Easier to Remember

Art and science may seem like polar opposites. One involves the creative flow of ideas, and the other cold, hard data — or so some people believe. In fact, the two have much in common. Both require a lot of creativity. People also use both to better understand the world around us. Now, a study finds, art also can help students remember better what they learned in science class. Read the article featured in Science News for Students.

Analysis: Teachers More Likely to Strike in Lowest-Paid Districts, States

Now that teachers in the Sacramento City Unified School District have completed their one-day strike, where might the next union action take place? A new analysis by the Center for American Progress suggests that districts and states with the lowest average teacher salaries might be the ones to watch. Read the article featured in Education DIVE.

Wyoming Board of Education to Reconsider Draft Computer Science Standards

The Wyoming State Board of Education will hold a full-day meeting in Riverton beginning at 8 a.m. on Thursday, April 25, at the Fremont County School District #25 board room located at 121 North 25th St. The SBE will first convene as the State Board of Vocational Education to hear an update from the Wyoming Department of Education and vote on the State Perkins V Transition Plan. The Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V) was signed into law by President Trump on July 31, 2018. This bipartisan measure reauthorizes the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which provides roughly $1.3 billion annually in Federal funding, administered by the U.S. Department of Education, for Career and Technical Education for our nation’s youth and adults. Read the article featured on KGAB.com.

Mismatch Seen Between New Science Tests and Stat Science Requirements

New science tests are rolling out across the country, but some teachers are worried that they will include a lot of questions on subjects their students haven’t studied. With schools in spring-testing mode, high school science teachers are watching intently to see how their students will do on the new exams. In some schools and districts, they’re noticing a mismatch between state or local science requirements and what’s on the tests. Read the article featured in Education Week.

Teach for America Targeted as Legislation Seeks to Limit Inexperienced Teachers in California

A California legislator wants to ban inexperienced teachers in programs such as Teach for America from working in predominantly low-income schools, saying they lack the preparation to work effectively with the neediest students. Read the article featured in EdSource.

Did the Common Core Kill Classroom Assessment?

Next year marks the 10-year anniversary of the Common Core State Standards; the Next Generation Science Standards have been around nearly as long. Today’s standards are meatier than their predecessors. More challenging. Demanding deeper and more complex learning. They are great standards for developing a curriculum or guiding classroom instruction perhaps, but in many aspects they are proving to be vexing for assessment. Read the article featured in Education Week.

In Professional Development for Online Teachers, Highlighting Failure Led the Way to Success

The Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township, on the west side of Indianapolis, has gotten a fair amount of attention for personalizing the professional development it gives to teachers in its virtual high school and blended learning programs. The fact that voluntary professional development can attract 90 percent of teachers is seen as a wild success. It’s that success the district, and by extension, Michele Eaton, its director of virtual and blended learning, has been known for. Until now. Read the article featured in The Hechinger Report.

Think You Want To Be A Teacher? Read This First

How can we equip new teachers to succeed? Guide aspiring teachers to the best training programs. Even better, give teachers crucial information about the learning process that even the best programs don’t provide. Read the article featured in Forbes.

Our Students – and Our Teachers – Need True Project-Based Learning

“I hate science and my mom didn’t pass physics, so I don’t need to either.” As a teacher, this is a tough thing to hear. It’s even tougher when the student has a point. I figured out quickly that reaching these students was going to require a different way of teaching. I needed to interest them, engage them, and challenge them in a way no lecture was ever going to do. I turned to project-based learning, an approach to teaching that is much more frequently discussed than it is understood—particularly in online education. Read the article featured in Real Clear Education.

Disney, Lucasfilm and FIRST to Inspire the Next Generation of Heroes and Innovators

Lucasfilm and parent company Disney, and the global K–12 nonprofit organization FIRST® (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) are working together to inspire the next generation of heroes and innovators through the Star Wars: Force for Change philanthropic initiative. On Saturday, April 13, during Star Wars Celebration in Chicago, it was announced that Disney and Lucasfilm are providing a $1.5 million donation, in-kind and mentorship resources to help expand access to FIRST programs for more students globally, with a focus on underserved communities. Read the press release.

Stay tuned for next week’s top education news stories.

The Communication, Legislative & Public Affairs (CLPA) team strives to keep NSTA members, teachers, science education leaders, and the general public informed about NSTA programs, products, and services and key science education issues and legislation. In the association’s role as the national voice for science education, its CLPA team actively promotes NSTA’s positions on science education issues and communicates key NSTA messages to essential audiences.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.


Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon

News Roundup banner

 

LOL

By Gabe Kraljevic

Posted on 2019-04-19

I like to infuse humour into my classroom. What is your opinion on teachers and students joking around? — T., Utah

I, too, am a jokester and like to have fun with my students. I attribute a large part of this to my own teachers who were funny and made their classrooms enjoyable.

Never make jests directed at an individual. I went too far early in my career: a teary-eyed boy came up to me after class to tell me that I had hurt him by repeatedly referring to a past incident. The next class I made a public apology to him.

There is a line at which you must stop students and yourself. Insults or “roasting” should never be permitted, even in jest. Stop the telling any dirty jokes immediately. While almost all students know that racist jokes should never be told, I worry that sexism may be overlooked. Stop any teasing, even between close friends. An innocuous tease may be picked up by someone outside their circle and repeated.

Be aware that some students may encourage you to tell jokes to sidetrack you. It can be hard to resist, so be wary of this tactic. I resorted to Joke of the Week on Fridays: I had a list of science-related jokes that I would pick from for a quick laugh at the end of the week usually told just before dismissing the class. I enjoyed sending the students off for the weekend with a “groaner!”

Hope this helps!

 

Image by Stefan Schweihofer from Pixabay 

I like to infuse humour into my classroom. What is your opinion on teachers and students joking around? — T., Utah

I, too, am a jokester and like to have fun with my students. I attribute a large part of this to my own teachers who were funny and made their classrooms enjoyable.

 

Ideas and inspiration from NSTA’s April 2019 K-12 journals

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2019-04-12

Regardless of what grade level or subject you teach, check out all three K-12 journals. As you skim through titles and descriptions of the articles, you may find ideas for lessons that would be interesting for your students, the inspiration to adapt a lesson to your grade level or subject, or the challenge to create/share your own lessons and ideas. Click on the links to read or add to your library.

The lessons described in the articles include a chart showing connections with the NGSS. The graphics are especially helpful in understanding the activities and in providing ideas for your own investigations.

NSTA members have access to the articles in all journals, including the Journal of College Science Teaching.

The Science Teacher – Science for All

Every year TST has an issue with this theme. Even if you teach elementary or middle school, you can find ideas and strategies that could be adapted to your students.

Editor’s Corner: Science For All – “Whether your interest is in diversity education, multicultural awareness, equity and inclusion issues, teaching English learners, or simply finding engaging teaching methods for all students, I encourage you to browse the TST online archive, where a simple keyword search will bring up a wealth of timeless articles and still-relevant activities on the ‘Science for All’ theme.”

Many authors share resources related to the lessons and strategies in their articles. These resources include rubrics, graphic organizers, handouts, diagrams, lists of resources, and complete lessons. You can access these through the Connections link for The Science Teacher.

  • Although many teachers have heard of and use Exit Tickets, their use could be even more effective. This article takes a closer look at this strategy, with examples, prompts, and action research results on how teachers can analyze the content and patterns of the student responses as formative assessment.
  • Using geospatial technologies while Investigating Urban Trees, students explore their school’s surroundings, identify trees, assess their environmental and social benefits, and investigate relationships between the location of trees and crime reports. The article showcases maps and charts and has suggestions and resources for similar projects.
  • Take a plant study unit to a new level by finding The Perfect Match between flowering plants and their pollinators.
  • Looking for a way to introduce genetics? Genetics for All describes a variety of activities, organized as learning stations, that focus on the topic. “With increasing class sizes, we recognize that station work acts as an additional support to students by allowing each student to have closer interactions with their teacher.”
  • A Web of Ideas is not about arachnids! The article introduces a scaffolding strategy to promote higher-level discourse in the classroom for students who may not understand how to have productive discussions. The article includes examples of questions, organizing strategies, student roles, and photos of students in action.

These monthly columns continue to provide background knowledge and classroom ideas:

For more on the content that provides a context for projects and strategies described in this issue, see the SciLinks topics Alexander Graham Bell, Cells, Chromosomes, Cloning, Coevolution, Communication Technology, Dichotomous Keys, Ecology, Ecosystems, Electrophoresis, Genetics, Inventors, Organelle, Pollination, Refraction, Telephone Technology, Transcription, Translation

 

Continue for Science and Children and Science Scope.

Science & Children – Shifting from a Kit to NGSS Strategies

Whether you’re an elementary teacher with an inventory of science kits or a secondary teacher with cookbook labs, these suggestions can help you adapt and update these lessons to incorporate NGSS disciplinary core ideas, crosscutting concepts, and science/engineering practices.

Editor’s Note: Shifting From Kits to NGSS Strategies: “The reality is that even the most exquisitely designed kit will fall short unless the teacher has time to immerse themselves in the pedagogy and understands the rationale for following prescribed steps. …As you implement some of the lessons and strategies in this month’s issue of Science and Children [and other journals], think about how we can continue to move from the cookbook recipe approach to designing wholesome, fully balanced learning situations.”

Many authors share resources related to the lessons and strategies in their articles. These resources include rubrics, graphic organizers, handouts, diagrams, lists of resources, and complete lessons. You can access these through the Connections link for Science & Children.

  • According to the author of The Early Years: Creating a Kit, “Kits make it easy for multiple teachers to teach the same lesson by having access without duplicating all materials, especially those that may be unique to a particular activity such as a spring scale or a set of igneous rocks. …The most useful kits are often those put together by you or another educator to meet updated standards or the specific needs of your program.” The article includes a how-to discussion on creating a kit to explore the properties of water.
  • Pulley Islands describes how to repurpose of kit on simple machines into an adventure in tinkering, which “encourages the use of authentic, hands-on experience to develop an understanding of content and physical materials” and explore problem solving with the concepts of force and motion.
  • Tinkering and problem solving are also the focus in From Global To Local, describing a summer enrichment program in which students explored mag-lev technology.
  • It’s Alive?!? poses a question for young students on determining the characteristics of living things by looking for patterns and creating a “checklist.”
  • The Worms Are Dancing! was the observation in a class of kindergarten students during this integrate unit as they studied live earthworms.
  • Cultivating Curiosity About Creatures includes photos of students’ work as they study the adaptations and behaviors of crayfish (although I suspect other available animals could be substituted in the lesson.)
  • Formative Assessment Probes: Our Best Thinking So Far includes the probe Can a Plant Break Rocks? The article also describes the structure of a probe and a rationale for using them to connect the three components of the NGSS.
  • Teaching Through Trade Books: The Dynamics Within Ecosystems includes two lessons (Growing Plants K-2 and An Owl’s Lunch 3-5) that take traditional lessons on planting seeds and dissecting owl pellets to a higher-level exploration of the concept of ecosystems. The K-2 lesson has a table focusing on variables that could be helpful to any grade level.
  • The lesson in Methods & Strategies: Getting a Grip also focuses on systems that include plants. The authors includes an “Investigations Framework” for “rethinking the classroom investigation” to encourage students in argumentation, explanation, and investigating.
  • Students design and create robotic animals, as part of the makerspace in Engineering Encounters: Animatronic Lions, and Tigers, and Bears Oh! My!

These monthly columns continue to provide background knowledge and classroom ideas:

For more on the content that provides a context for projects and strategies described in this issue, see the SciLinks topics Adaptations of Animals, Arthropods, Buoyancy, Characteristics of Living Things, Ecosystems, Erosion, Forces and Motion, Inventions, Magnetic Fields, Pitch, Robots, Simple Machines, Sound, Water Cycle, Worms

 

Science Scope – Biological Evolution

From the Editor’s Desk The Necessity of Teaching Evolution – “Teachers can help students develop scientific habits of mind by requiring them to ask questions and practice separating fact from fiction. This skill is at the heart of being able to think scientifically, particularly when it comes to understanding abstract theories such as evolution…. Only by teaching students to think like scientists will Darwin’s theory become better understood.”

Articles in this issue that describe lessons (many of which use the 5E model) include a helpful sidebar documenting the big idea, essential pre-knowledge, time, safety issues, and cost. The lessons also include connections with the NGSS.

Many authors share resources related to the lessons and strategies in their articles. These resources include rubrics, graphic organizers, handouts, diagrams, lists of resources, and complete lessons. You can access these through the Connections link for Science Scope.

  • The authors of Making Critical Thinking Visible for Student Analysis and Reflection provide links to the resources and a detailed description of the process designed to support critical thinking, analysis, and reflection. Students applied the process using the question “What dinosaur did these bones come from?”
  • Sharing the Wonder of Natural History has several suggestions for overcoming “nature-deficit disorder,” including nature journaling (template provided), creating local field guides, focused scavenger hunts, and studying the work of nature artists (with suggestions).
  • You probably already have the materials for Science on a Shoestring: Using Insect Biodiversity to Build Basic Skills. This activity is deceptively simple, but students can plan investigations, collect and analyze data, interpret and graph their results, and communicate their results.
  • Integrating Technology: Genetics with Dragons describes a digital genetics game (free-link is provided) in which students explore the connections between genes, cells, proteins, traits, and inheritance patterns.
  • Teacher’s Toolkit: Jumping to Conclusions elaborates a “jump and reach” activity into a lesson on predictive modeling in which they apply measurements, basic statistics, and graphing.
  • Citizen Science: Squirrel Mapper demonstrates that what goes on outside the window is not necessarily a distraction, but could be an integral part of the learning and investigating processes. Students investigate variations in squirrel colorations.
  • Commentary: Using Critical Thinking Skills to Counter Misinformation “Teachers should teach students how to investigate suspicious ‘scientific’ claims they encounter in media. In general, students should be taught to think critically using Purpose, Author, Relevance, Currency, and Sources (PARCS).” The article describes these criteria.
  • “To help develop students’ writing skills, we need to provide them with opportunities to write often. For students who may struggle with writing, we can scaffold writing with talk, showcase positive writing models, and use graphic organizers and writing frames.” Science for All: Evolving Students’ Writing Skills has suggestions for developing writing skills in science.
  • Teacher to Teacher: Speaking and Listening in the Classroom has ideas for incorporating two components of literacy that are often overlooked. Students may need guidance on presenting and listing critically to others

These monthly columns continue to provide background knowledge and classroom ideas:

For more on the content that provides a context for projects and strategies described in this issue, see the SciLinks topics Adaptation of Plants, Animal Adaptations, Biodiversity, Biological Evolution, Climate, Deserts, Dichotomous Keys, Dinosaurs, Dominant and Recessive Traits, Fossils, Genetics, Insects, Migration, Satellite Technology, Vertebrate Evolution, Wetlands

Regardless of what grade level or subject you teach, check out all three K-12 journals. As you skim through titles and descriptions of the articles, you may find ideas for lessons that would be interesting for your students, the inspiration to adapt a lesson to your grade level or subject, or the challenge to create/share your own lessons and ideas. Click on the links to read or add to your library.

 

Ed News: Here’s The Math That Proves Teachers Are Underpaid

By Kate Falk

Posted on 2019-04-12

News Roundup banner

This week in education news, math that proves teachers are underpaid; how 29 year old Katie Bouman helped to capture the image of a black hole; and how STEM may help you to win next year’s March Madness bracket.

That Image Of A Black Hole You Saw Everywhere? Thank This Grad Student for Making It Possible

Three years ago, Katie Bouman led the creation of an algorithm that eventually helped capture this first-of-its-kind image: a supermassive black hole and its shadow at the center of a galaxy known as M87. She was then a graduate student in computer science and artificial intelligence at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Read the article featured on CNN.com

We Cheer On Women in the Sciences, But Recruiting and Retaining Them Is Still a Different Story

It’s a great time for celebrating women in science. Unfortunately, research shows that women in STEM fields face persistent challenges and biases that limit their influence and growth, and may dissuade other women from pursuing STEM professions despite clear cultural encouragement at large. Read the article featured on CNN.com.

Here’s The Math That Proves Teachers Are Underpaid

“I see teachers as the most important resource in schools. Teachers’ impact on students persists into adulthood. Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in the nation’s public schools requires good working conditions, including competent and supportive leadership and a collegial environment. But pay matters.” Read more from this op-ed in the Chicago Sun Times.

​How STEM May Help You Win Next Year’s March Madness Office Pool

This year’s NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament may be over, but the concepts of how to use statistical and mathematical analysis to predict better brackets remain. Read the article featured on TechRepublic.com.

Teach for America, Except in California

Backed by teacher unions, Democrats are pushing to ban Teach for America from California amid a wave of teacher’s strikes and a heated debate over charter schools in the nation’s most populous state. Read the article featured in Politico.

NASA Kelly twins study shows harsh effects of space flight and a brutal return to Earth

Astronaut Scott Kelly says he didn’t feel normal until eight months after he returned from the International Space Station. Read the article featured in Washington Post.

Stay tuned for next week’s top education news stories.

The Communication, Legislative & Public Affairs (CLPA) team strives to keep NSTA members, teachers, science education leaders, and the general public informed about NSTA programs, products, and services and key science education issues and legislation. In the association’s role as the national voice for science education, its CLPA team actively promotes NSTA’s positions on science education issues and communicates key NSTA messages to essential audiences.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.


Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon

 

News Roundup banner

This week in education news, math that proves teachers are underpaid; how 29 year old Katie Bouman helped to capture the image of a black hole; and how STEM may help you to win next year’s March Madness bracket.

 

Sad State of Affairs

By Gabe Kraljevic

Posted on 2019-04-11

I have observed a lack of emphasis on science concepts in the elementary classroom. Does this seem to be common practice in other schools? Any suggestions on how to incorporate multiple subjects within a science lesson to help alleviate this?
– K., Tennessee

The sad fact is that science, like many disciplines, takes a back seat to the big subjects: Language Arts (LA) and Math.

The tendency to treat all subjects as separate entities instead of incorporating them into many elementary learning activities only makes the disparity worse. When LA and math are emphasized on assessments, it is easy to justify reducing time spent on other subjects to make sure students understand and, hopefully, perform better. Other factors limiting science education include elementary teachers who have very little background in science and may fear teaching it; limited budgets for science supplies and resources; and limited professional development (PD) funding which is frequently earmarked for LA and math conferences which in turn leads to teachers who may not be confident in attempting exciting, hands-on activities.

Many natural phenomena can be used as thematic launch pads for wonderful learning experiences in all subjects. Millions of monarch butterflies descend on specific, isolated valleys in Mexico, but they were born all over North America. They are the grandchildren of the monarchs that hatched in Mexico! Imagine the geography, art, language, math and science that can all be taught diving into this story.

Check out NSTA’s NGSS Hub (https://ngss.nsta.org/) on how you can do this.

Hope this helps!

 

Photo credit:  Public Domain via Pixabay

I have observed a lack of emphasis on science concepts in the elementary classroom. Does this seem to be common practice in other schools? Any suggestions on how to incorporate multiple subjects within a science lesson to help alleviate this?
– K., Tennessee

The sad fact is that science, like many disciplines, takes a back seat to the big subjects: Language Arts (LA) and Math.

 

Editorial

Growing the CSL Community

Connected Science Learning April-June 2019 (Volume 1, Issue 10)

By Beth Murphy, David L. Evans, and Cristin Dorgelo

In this discussion, Field Editor Beth Murphy, NSTA Executive Director David Evans, and ASTC President and CEO Cristin Dorgelo discuss the origins of Connected Science Learning, and what’s next for the journal. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

 

Beth: I want to thank you both for finding time to talk about Connected Science Learning. It’s great to have this opportunity to share with readers how the journal began, why it’s important to both organizations, and how we hope to continue to grow the CSL community. David, can you start by telling us how the journal came to be?

David: The idea of having a journal that would pull together the informal science community and the K–12 world was on my agenda the day I arrived [at NSTA six years ago]. From the NSTA perspective, it seemed to me like [museums provided] a wonderful resource that we weren’t using enough in the K–12 space. So, my first motivation was to figure out a way to better connect museums and K–12 education. [From the other side,] museum and zoo educators were really committed to engaging people in STEM through their programs and associated tools and resources collections, but they were typically not very connected to what was going on in the world of classroom teachers. When I discovered that there was no regular means of communication between these communities and that a fairly large number of informal educators were already part of NSTA, I wanted to develop a communication medium—a journal—that would have the same review standards as NSTA’s other journals but was deliberately intended to bring in the informal science community. In many ways that’s still my main interest: How do we bring these communities together and provide a place where ideas and seriously reviewed work can be exchanged? Dennis Schatz [the founding field editor for CSL and incoming president of NSTA] was on detail at NSF [National Science Foundation] as a program manager at that time. We started talking about it, and eventually got a little money from NSF to get started. And the rest is history, as they say.

Beth Murphy / CSL

Beth: Thanks! Cristin, please share how Connected Science Learning brings value to ASTC and its members and why your organization is supporting this effort.

Cristin: So much of what David just shared is part of the rationale behind ASTC’s support of Connected Science Learning. I joined ASTC a little over a year ago and, at that time, I went on a listening tour to science museums, science centers, and our partners in the broader informal science learning community. I heard over and over again comments that make me think that Connected Science Learning is so relevant. One is that science museums recognize that they have existing partnerships, that they sit in a complex ecosystem where learners in STEM are able to tap into a variety of resources—whether that’s in the formal system, after-school programs, or at the science museum, for example—and that better linking providers of STEM education by connecting research to practice is so important. We can learn from each other across informal and formal, in-school and after-school, summertime learning and even the private sector, which is engaging with that ecosystem through approaches like mentorship and apprenticeship. These are all opportunities that allow an individual in a community to forge a new connection with science and STEM. And so, better linking those together is a smart thing to do. I also heard that there is an appetite for understanding practices that work and the evidence behind what makes a practice effective for science engagement or science communication. This curiosity about what’s happening in the ecosystem is something I heard clearly from science museums, and I know is shared by the NSTA community. Today, there is so much connection between formal and informal—there are classroom teachers who receive professional development and curriculum ideas from the informal community, and vice versa—who contribute to, volunteer in, and bring their students to science museums. We are already networked, so becoming a learning community is very important for our shared future.

Beth: The recent federal Strategy for STEM Education called out the importance of blending successful educational practices from across the learning landscape. Both of you have some policy background; what can you add about how the government is thinking about STEM education?

David Evans / NSTA

David:  I think the report is an important signal that there’s a very strong national interest, with lots of threads, around STEM education. The threads come from the private sector and out-of-school programs, as Cristin mentioned, as well as a movement within K–12 education to promote STEM programs and STEM schools. The federal report recognizes very clearly two important aspects of STEM education. The one that most people think of is workforce development; kids need to be educated for jobs that don’t yet exist, but that are almost certainly going to depend in a significant way on STEM subjects and the ways in which those subjects are brought together to solve problems. This workforce concern has the private sector energized—simply getting enough workers to do existing work, let alone what’s coming in the future. But I think the other part that’s emphasized in the plan is equally important: Given the role of technology and advancements in science in the world today, being an informed citizen requires people to have an understanding of STEM subjects, how to evaluate evidence, and how to look at the implications of the things that we’re finding. [This is an issue] that hasn’t received a lot of prominence in the past, yet we can make the case that it’s become much more important. The report actually captured both of these aspects, and if the plan is going to be successful, it must influence agencies as they develop their own implementation plans. It will outline ways that these various groups can continue to work together, whether it’s a K–12 classroom, after-school or out-of-school program, programs run at museums and zoos, or activities sponsored and fostered by national corporations and local companies. I think the report provides encouragement that can be used to make progress on these two broad fronts.

Cristin Dorgelo / ASTC

Cristin: I would add that there is emphasis in the report on all of us being part of reaching its goals, on STEM education for all Americans. Formal education, informal education, the private sector, and community organizations have a role to play. There’s a direct tie to the mission of Connected Science Learning. At ASTC we have been reflecting on the goals of the report and noting—with our partners in formal education and throughout communities across the United States—that there are five areas where we’re seeing a lot of alignment with our shared work. One is our commitment to reaching underserved and underrepresented groups and communities, and the practices that are effective in doing that. Connected Science Learning really speaks to the effectiveness of reaching more audiences. The second area is how we look at ecosystem approaches themselves so that those practices can be blended, which could not be more core to Connected Science Learning. The third [area focuses on] transdisciplinary learning as an approach to connect more people with STEM fields. The idea that if you learn throughout your life, that if you are given an opportunity to make your community better through STEM, you’re more likely to stick with it—that’s something that requires all of our organizations to be working together, because to provide somebody a transdisciplinary experience takes more than one of our institutions alone. And the call from the report to focus on mathematics and computer science, and even more broadly computer science habits of mind and 21st-century skills, is an emphasis where there is a lot of shared work across both informal and formal learning environments. Finally, [the report highlights] the idea that technology has a role to play in education itself. There are classrooms across the country that are connecting with technology as a teaching and learning tool. And there are museums that use and experiment  with technology as a communication and learning platform. What can we, share with the federal government about the effectiveness of technology-focused learning? I see a lot of opportunities for Connected Science Learning to continue to tell the story of connections between formal and informal, and influence the government’s understanding of what’s actually happening on the ground with ecosystems around this learning, and what helps us make progress toward the ambitious goals of the plan.

Beth: We’ve talked a little bit about the audience that Connected Science Learning intends to reach, whom we hope will be contributors and advocates and stakeholders [for the journal]. There’s more we can do to ensure that all of the voices of this [STEM] community are represented as readers and authors. I’m wondering what ideas you have for building awareness of Connected Science Learning in that broader community of STEM education stakeholders, and for continuing to improve the value of CSL for those stakeholders.

Cristin: We’ve been describing this broad view of who and what types of organizations contribute to science learning. I think one question we have is: As the readers of Connected Science Learning are thinking about their partners in the private sector and other educational institutions, is there a benefit to those partners being more actively engaged in the Connected Science Learning community? [We want] to truly make good on the vision for these connections across the learning ecosystem. It would be great to see voices from across that ecosystem reflected in who’s writing for and not just who’s reading Connected Science Learning. Together, ASTC and NSTA are thinking about our national-level networks that could be engaged and connected to the work of this journal, to the writing in this journal, so that members are encouraged from across those networks to contribute.

David: I think Cristin has captured [our thinking]. NSTA continues to explore the informal space that we have not really played in a lot in the past. We’ve had conversations with out-of-school programs like the Girl Scouts and the National 4-H program. Both of those organizations have strong STEM education programs. They represent the kind of broader reach we’re trying to get, and one of the ways that I think we’ll succeed is by encouraging contributions from folks in those programs. There’s another aspect that I think will become increasingly important in terms of extending CSL’s reach: the fact that it’s published online. It’s also open access, so you don’t need to be a member of NSTA or ASTC to read every article. This is a novel publishing environment for NSTA. And it’s one that has a lot of opportunity for discovery that a traditional, member-based print journal simply doesn’t have. I think that the format is giving us an opportunity to experiment with a different kind of publication. I’m hoping that these advantages [will lead to] a greater reach. [There is also] an opportunity for readers to contribute by commenting on articles. With our printed journals, the publication time is sufficiently long that you often don’t get a dialogue. I’d like to see Connected Science Learning  build more engagement through online dialogue around the items that are published. This would help to build those bridges among the different participating communities.

Cristin: And to really build together a learning community—yes, exactly.

Beth: Exciting ideas! David, you mentioned earlier that CSL was about three years in the making before the first issue was published. I’ve noted that it’s been almost three years now since that first issue. Where would NSTA and ASTC like to see Connected Science Learning go in the future? What would you like to see it accomplish?

David: I have an ambitious hope that CSL might [one day] be seen as an initiative that helped lead NSTA into the current century and get out of the last one. We’re engaged in a process of doing that very broadly across the association right now, where we’re in the throes of implementing a digital engagement strategy that makes interaction with the association look much more like our interactions with most of the rest of the things in our lives. Right now, CSL is one of the few things that NSTA does that really looks like that, with its being published online. Having an opportunity for interaction, I think, is exactly the sort of thing that the association world needs. If associations are going to prosper in the future, [they need to be] a place where discussion can take place, as well as being the source of authoritative, best-practice, solid information. I see CSL helping lead NSTA in that direction. It’s my hope that we have an opportunity to have a much broader discussion about what STEM education is, what and how it relates to the rest of society, and how it connects to practical problems. I see CSL as a leading program going forward, and a critical component of that is the [expansion] of what we mean by “teaching science.”

Cristin: I think if that vision comes to fruition, and we have created an open forum where these ideas and connections can flourish, wouldn’t it be amazing if five years from now as the federal government and communities across the country are assessing their progress against national goals, we can look back at Connected Science Learning as being a place where [STEM education stakeholders] found a spark to try something new, inspiration for new connections within their community, and practices they want to put to work within their own institutions? I hope that we can, through that open-forum approach, help move some of the national needles related to connecting more people to STEM.

David: And, you know there’s reason not to view that as a fantasy. I think there’s real substance to it. I would love to claim personal credit for getting Connected Science Learning that really nice recognition in the [Strategy for STEM Education], but I had nothing to do with it. That’s a really good signal that Connected Science Learning has a vision that’s much broader than that of [just] ASTC and NSTA.

Cristin: Yes. The last thing I would say is that we welcome feedback from contributors to and readers of Connected Science Learning. We would love to know what would make this a more fruitful forum for collaborations across the learning ecosystem. Our doors are always open to learn more about the community’s good ideas for how to better leverage this platform.

Beth: Wow! You two set me up for the perfect closing. Readers, we invite you to join the conversation. Please take this opportunity to share your questions, comments, and ideas about Connected Science Learning and how we can continue to grow its reach and value. We can’t wait to hear from you!

 

Beth Murphy, PhD (bmurphy@nsta.org) is field editor for Connected Science Learning and an independent STEM education consultant with expertise in fostering collaboration between organizations and schools, providing professional learning experiences for educators, and implementing program evaluation that supports practitioners to do their best work. David L. Evans is the executive director of the National Science Teachers Association, the world's largest professional organization representing science educators of all grade levels. Cristin Dorgelo (CDorgelo@astc.org) is president and CEO of the Association of Science–Technology Centers in Washington, DC.

Field Editor Beth Murphy, NSTA Executive Director David Evans, and ASTC President and CEO Cristin Dorgelo discuss what’s next for Connected Science Learning.
Field Editor Beth Murphy, NSTA Executive Director David Evans, and ASTC President and CEO Cristin Dorgelo discuss what’s next for Connected Science Learning.
Subscribe to
Asset 2