By Debra Shapiro
Posted on 2011-11-11
The audience for Colonel Geoffrey Ling’s presentation had a treat yesterday. Ling, who is program manager for the Defense Science Office at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), said that this conference was “the first national meeting” in which an “amazing breakthrough” would be announced. That breakthrough is a prosthetic arm that a person can control using his or her own brain—a miracle for our troops wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan and for others with injuries or disabilities.
Ling said DARPA was founded in the 1950s in response to Sputnik and was “set free” to work on “high-risk, high-payoff projects.” He asked teachers to share some great ideas for future science innovations, and each one they called out—such as teleportation and flying cars—may someday be possible, according to Ling, because of the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) that creates an “enabling technology. The enabling technology starts the process.”
He pointed out that many young children don’t know the meaning of “it can’t be done–in their own minds, it can be done.” Only when they grow up do they become “jaded” and closed to the possibilities. Ling says teachers need to be mindful of this and find ways to get students to expand their imaginations. “The brain is very adaptable..That’s like what teachers do [help young brains adapt].”
He also stressed the importance of student teamwork: “Always start with teams. It’s always a team [of scientists and engineers that create these innovations].” He said more than 200 scientists, engineers, physical therapists, and other experts worked on the prosthetic arm, “all inspired by [the] teachers” who taught them STEM.
Ling walked us through all of the steps taken to develop the prosthetic arm. Much of the work was accomplished using monkeys and studying their movements. The monkeys even assisted during the testing of the “remote control” of the arm. They learned how to control it by thinking about what they wanted it to do: Get it to grasp a food treat, then bring the treat to their mouths. Ling forsees that “30 years from now,” humans will drive a car by using their brains to control it. He also predicts “visual prosthetics are around the corner,” and artificial exoskeletons will enable elderly persons to regain movement. “Grandma can ski again!,” he exclaimed.
During the Q&A portion that followed, educators asked Ling about other possible STEM innovations. For each one, Ling assured them it could be done—and DARPA was working on it. The audience’s amazement and delight was palpable.
To see videos of some of the amazing work of DARPA and its partners, go to
I talked to one enthusiastic attendee about what he appreciated about Ling’s talk.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnUcL4NUVj8[/youtube]
The audience for Colonel Geoffrey Ling’s presentation had a treat yesterday. Ling, who is program manager for the Defense Science Office at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), said that this conference was “the first national meeting” in which an “amazing breakthrough” would be announced.
By Claire Reinburg
Posted on 2011-11-11
The NSTA Science Store at the conferences is a popular meeting spot where teachers can browse new teaching resources and NSTA gear while catching up with colleagues. A few of the popular books at the Store in New Orleans include Science the “Write” Way, Picture-Perfect Science Lessons, 2nd Edition; Celebrating Cultural Diversity: Science for All; Companion Classroom Activities for Stop Faking It! Force and Motion; and STEM Student Research Handbook. Authors like John
Eichinger, the guru of Activities Linking Science With Math, K–4, and 5–8, also stop by to visit and talk about their books after sessions conclude. It’s fun to see science teachers sporting NSTA gear items like “I Love Science” hoodies and t-shirts while rushing to their next workshop session. A cool new item debuting at the New Orleans Store, inspired by Sarah Young’s Gourmet Lab book, is an apron declaring “My Other Lab Is My Kitchen.” All the books displayed at the Store and many of the gear items are available through the online Science Store, too.
By Debra Shapiro
Posted on 2011-11-10
Stephen Pruitt, vice president for content, research, and development for Achieve, Inc., gave teachers an engaging preview of the Next Generation Science Standards during his talk this afternoon. “We have incredible teachers in this country…that’s the reason [the NGSS] will go forward,” he maintains. He also emphasized that the NGSS are “for all students” because all students are “born investigators,” and noted that some Nobel prize winners are working on the committee to develop the new standards.
The new standards will emphasize that understanding builds over time, and they “don’t stop at just memorizing details,” but will require students to understand “the evidence of how something works,” such as cell division. He referred to the NGSS as “inquiry unpacked,” a term he said he’s not crazy about but admits is important because not all educators have a cohesive understanding of what inquiry is.
The NGSS will reflect that “math is part of the language of science” and will indicate to teachers “here’s where math is appropriate,” Pruitt explained. Cross-cutting concepts are key in the NGSS because “shouldn’t energy be the same regardless of which class you’re sitting in?”
He suggests teachers think about the NGSS outside of their classroom and school and “come together for what will be good for the students, not what will be good for me…I’m going to ask that you have an open mind.” He reminded everyone, “When was the last time that we got better by doing less?” He urged teachers to read the framework, if they haven’t yet done so, because the framework serves as a preview to what will be in the new standards.
When teachers in the audience expressed concerns about how the NGSS will be implemented in their states, Pruitt responded, “Make sure people are informed about this and build a base…You can lead from your classroom just like any policy leader can.”
Here’s what Terri Jones of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, had to say about this session.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY3epUjmeaY[/youtube]
Stephen Pruitt, vice president for content, research, and development for Achieve, Inc., gave teachers an engaging preview of the Next Generation Science Standards during his talk this afternoon. “We have incredible teachers in this country…that’s the reason [the NGSS] will go forward,” he maintains.
By Debra Shapiro
Posted on 2011-11-10
Who knew that actress Morgan Fairchild knew so much about science? “I was the original science nerd,” she told the audience during her keynote speech this morning. Fairchild, the daughter of a high school English teacher and an engineer, said that when she first came to Hollywood, her first stop was not the beauty salon, but the La Brea tar pits. She has hosted a panel on paleontology, where she was thrilled to show off a saber-tooth tiger’s skull; given presentations to the Senate about AIDS and environmental issues; studied anthropology; and keeps up with the latest medical discoveries, calling herself “a virus geek.” “If I can walk and chew gum at the same time, people are amazed,” she quipped, adding, “I may be blond, but I’m not stupid.”
She urges teachers to help their students see “science not as a drudgery, but as a door” to “a good and financially sound life.” While she believes the literary and entertainment worlds—such as the CSI television series—can hook students on science, she contends that “there will always be a new entertainment icon … but who is going to be the new Bill Gates?”
“Science has a great effect on the economy,” and “we can’t afford to fail,” she points out. The United States needs to preserve genetic diversity to ensure agricultural success and address health care issues that also threaten our economic future, she explains. “Fresh water is what the next wars will be fought about, not oil,” she maintains.
“It’s going to be the kids in your classes” who will have to deal with the issues of climate change, Fairchild observes. So it’s up to science educators to discover new methods of teaching to keep students engaged, and “our kids have to put in more time” studying science, technology, engineering, and math like children in other nations do, she contends. In addition, teachers should “fully exploit the mental capacities of girls and minorities” because “all societies improve economically” when women and minorities are in the workplace.
Fairchild received a standing ovation following her speech. Audience members praised her for her scientific knowledge and support for education–AND her beauty. Dr. Betty Crocker had this to say:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifuAPhvk6HA[/youtube]
NSTA President-Elect Karen Ostlund also weighed in:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mykeAxTDZPk[/youtube]
Who knew that actress Morgan Fairchild knew so much about science? “I was the original science nerd,” she told the audience during her keynote speech this morning.
By Claire Reinburg
Posted on 2011-11-10
By Martin Horejsi
Posted on 2011-11-09
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41vZCadbAk[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dzn_Kr7mgyc[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHe-ToUj3aY[/youtube]
The list of judges is quite impressive, as it should be, including none other that Stephen Hawking!
You can read the details online, but one of the prizes is, pending NASA approval, to have your experiment conducted live (on YouTube of course) on the International Space Station!
Good luck!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41vZCadbAk[/youtube]
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2011-11-09
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
By Francis Eberle
Posted on 2011-11-08
By Debra Shapiro
Posted on 2011-11-07
When a scientist visits a classroom, a kind of magic happens for teachers and students. For students, the visit can be an experience that shapes their perception of scientists and the nature of science. For teachers, the visit can be the start of a partnership with someone who shares their passion for science, as well as someone who brings the latest research–and sometimes even the latest in lab equipment–into the classroom.
Technology has made it even easier to bring a scientist to the classroom, as you’ll learn in this article from the November issue of NSTA Reports. Find out the ingredients your colleagues and some visiting scientists recommend to create an unforgettable learning experience that makes a scientist’s work more real to your students. And leave a comment about your own experiences: What made your scientist’s visit a “hit” with your students?
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2011-11-01
Reading publications from other organizations related to literacy, administration, and technology provides a context for science instruction. An article I recently read has relevance for science teachers: 10 Things Every Literacy Educator Should Know About Research.
The article, by Nell Duke and Nicole Martin, was in the September 2011 issue of The Reading Teacher. TRT’s editors have provided access to the article here. The authors wrote for an audience of reading teachers, but you can easily substitute “science” or other content areas for literacy.
It seems educators have a hot/cold relationship with educational research. We’re hot on studies validating our experiences and existing practices. And we’re cool toward research whose findings challenge our beliefs or “tried and true” practices. I worked with a teacher who refused to do any cooperative learning, stating it was just play time for students. The department chair showed her many studies demonstrating how cooperative learning (when appropriately implemented) can assist student learning. He offered her an opportunity to observe his students working cooperatively on activities. A colleague’s own action research indicated students enjoyed learning this way, after some modeling and guidance by the teacher. At that point, her response became, “You don’t know my students. They aren’t mature enough.”(She taught 10th graders.)
The authors, writing in conversational language, demystify research and make the point that educators should be critical consumers of research. The 10 items discussed in the article include a discussion of each:
In my conversations with teachers and administrators, I’ve seen some of the misconceptions addressed in this article.
This article could be discussed as a professional development activity or at the beginning of a graduate course. It would be fascinating to have a science-related example of each type of research.
Unfortunately, research is often inaccessible to teachers. Studies are frequently published in subscription-only journals (both print and online). They are also written in “scholarly” language that takes a while to process. But there are ways to make research more available to teachers. For example, the July 2011 issue of Science Scope includes Current Research: 2011 Summer Reading Suggestions with summaries of several studies relevant to science teaching and learning. It might be helpful for reviews such as this to be included more frequently in NSTA publications.
A final point made in the article is that “action research” is not one of the types of research in their table. The authors note teachers can and do conduct classroom-based research that fits into these types. When conducting classroom research, the teacher has expanded his or her role from a consumer of research to a producer. And NSTA publications are often a venue for sharing the results.
Graphic: http://www.flickr.com/photos/crystaljingsr/3914729343/sizes/z/in/photostream/
Reading publications from other organizations related to literacy, administration, and technology provides a context for science instruction. An article I recently read has relevance for science teachers: 10 Things Every Literacy Educator Should Know About Research.