By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2015-08-23
As the new school year is getting underway, are you looking for some experiences to get students focused on scientific thinking and research skills? How can we show students what scientists actually “do” and how they communicate? Many teachers share science articles on current research with students or assign students to find them on the Internet. To interact with the information, students are often asked to complete a teacher-created reading guide, answer questions, or write a summary.
In one of the NSTA’s listserves, the Natural Inquirer was mentioned and recommended as a way to connect current science with the scientists who do the research. The publication is described as a “middle school science education journal” for students and teachers and is published by the USDA Forest Service. The articles are written by scientists who conduct various types of research. These aren’t just summaries or digests–the articles describe the methodology and discuss the results, just like an article in a professional science journal. The difference is that these are written in student-friendly language and include resources for the classroom.
In each issue, the articles can be downloaded as PDF files, and some are also available in Spanish. Each article introduces the scientists and has a glossary, graphs, diagrams, charts, and photographs in a visually appealing format. What I really like, though, are the reflection questions throughout the article to get students to stop and think as they read. Many articles also have a “factivity” that extends the concept to the classroom as a hands-on investigation or a vocabulary review.
Some of the issues have several articles relating to a theme; others are monographs with one article. You can browse the contents of each issue, but I found the search feature helpful. The “Education Resources” link has ideas for lesson plans, downloadable podcasts, and slide shows. And, best of all, the PDF articles, downloads, and other resources are FREE.
The articles are multidisciplinary, focusing not just on biology and ecology, but also on related topics in the physical and earth sciences. These articles are robust enough to be used in activities that reflect science practices, and lesson ideas are included. To see what this would look like, check out Engaging Students in the Analysis and Interpretation of Real-World Data in the November 2013 issue of NSTA’s Science Scope.
If you’re an elementary or high school teacher, take a look at this site, too. Even though the journal is designed for the middle school level, the articles and activities could be useful at other grade levels: for upper elementary students who are interested in science and who could handle the reading level or for high school students with little experience in science thinking and hands-on science or those who struggle with the advanced reading level in traditional textbooks. Or for teachers who want to learn more for themselves! For example, living in coastal Delaware and participating in horseshoe crab counts every spring, I was interested in the article How Do Horseshoe Crab and Red Knot Populations Affect Each Other?
The site also describes two other publications with “readers” for K-2 students that describe the work of scientists, and the Investi-gator for upper elementary.
As the new school year is getting underway, are you looking for some experiences to get students focused on scientific thinking and research skills? How can we show students what scientists actually “do” and how they communicate? Many teachers share science articles on current research with students or assign students to find them on the Internet. To interact with the information, students are often asked to complete a teacher-created reading guide, answer questions, or write a summary.
By Robert Yager
Posted on 2015-08-21
Many teachers feel they are “doing” science when they teach what is in textbooks, laboratory manuals, and their lectures. Such a focus on science teaching has existed for decades. Teachers, school administrators, students, as well as parents, have generally accepted it as “doing” science. But, expecting students to remember and recite what they have read or been told is not “doing” science.
There are specific examples commonly used to indicate such “doing” of science. Strangely, however, they all have NOTHING to do with science itself. Examples used to indicate this teaching include:
Science teaching needs to change if we want students to experience the real “doing” of science. Students need to be involved in solving personal, current, and societal problems by asking questions that can substantiate possible answers. These actions are examples of “doing” science!
It should be remembered that science is “the human exploration of the natural world, seeking explanations of objects and events encountered, and providing evidence to support the explanations proposed.”
How can we get the old traditional ways of science teaching to change? Is STEM the answer? Will it take 70+ years for real changes to occur generally?
Or will it mean playing The Game of Science Education, as edited by Jeffrey Weld, executive director of the governor’s STEM council in Iowa, which uses the game metaphor to educate teachers about science teaching.
Robert E. Yager
Professor of Science Education
University of Iowa
Many teachers feel they are “doing” science when they teach what is in textbooks, laboratory manuals, and their lectures. Such a focus on science teaching has existed for decades. Teachers, school administrators, students, as well as parents, have generally accepted it as “doing” science. But, expecting students to remember and recite what they have read or been told is not “doing” science.
By Carole Hayward
Posted on 2015-08-18
In the new NSTA Press book Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6-8, 20 lab activities present an innovative approach to lab instruction called argument-driven inquiry (ADI). Use of these labs can help teachers align their instruction with current recommendations for making life science more meaningful for students and more effective for teachers.
Authors Patrick Enderle, Ruth Bickel, Leeanne Gleim, Ellen Granger, Jonathon Grooms, Melanie Hester, Ashley Murphy, Victor Sampson, and Sherry Southerland organize the labs around four Life Science core ideas, providing introductory and application labs for each.
Section 1 of the book begins with two chapters describing the ADI instructional model and the development and components of the ADI lab investigations. Sections 2–5 contain the lab investigations, including notes for the teacher, student handouts, and checkout questions. Section 6 contains four appendixes with connections to the NGSS timeline, proposal options for the investigations, and a form for assessing the investigation reports.
Here are a few examples of the lab investigations:
From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes
Introduction Lab
Application Lab
Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics
Introduction Lab
Application Lab
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation in Traits
Introduction Lab
Application Lab
Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity
Introduction Lab
Application Lab
The ADI instructional model focuses on authentic lab activities so that students have more experiences engaging in scientific practices such as asking questions and defining problems, developing and using models, and analyzing and interpreting data. This type of instruction requires that students receive feedback and learn from their mistakes so they can incorporate their new knowledge and experiences into future labs and investigations. The ADI activities presented in this book are thoughtfully constructed to help students learn science in authentic contexts and also to develop the required knowledge, skills, abilities, and habits of mind to do science.
This book is also available as an e-book. To learn more, visit the Argument-Driven Inquiry Series page.
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Follow NSTA
In the new NSTA Press book Argument-Driven Inquiry in Life Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6-8, 20 lab activities present an innovative approach to lab instruction called argument-driven in
By Lauren Jonas, NSTA Assistant Executive Director
Posted on 2015-08-16
“You stood in front of your community and said, ‘This is the scholar I have become. This is what I can do.’ And in doing so, you reminded all of us of what young people can do when given the freedom and the support to dream big.”
–Chris Lehmann, Graduation Speech to the SLA Class of 2015,
Chris Lehmann motivates students every day as the founding principal of the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia. This November 12-14, he’ll be doing the same for teachers. Lehmann will be a featured speaker at the 2015 Area Conference on Science Education in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he’ll be encouraging science teachers to think in new ways about how they engage students. Don’t miss “Beyond Googling—Building the Conditions for Structured Inquiry,” on Friday, November 13 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM, in the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Ballroom A, when Lehmann will discuss what he sees as the five core values of Inquiry, Research, Collaboration, Presentation, and Reflection, which are at the heart of the inquiry process.
What else will you learn about teaching revolutionary science in the digital age? Below is a small sampling of other sessions on this topic:
Want more? Check out more sessions and other events with the Philadelphia Session Browser/Personal Scheduler. Follow all our conference tweets using #NSTA15, and if you tweet, please feel free to tag us @NSTA so we see it!
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Future NSTA Conferences
2015 Area Conferences
Follow NSTA
“You stood in front of your community and said, ‘This is the scholar I have become. This is what I can do.’ And in doing so, you reminded all of us of what young people can do when given the freedom and the support to dream big.”
By Lauren Jonas, NSTA Assistant Executive Director
Posted on 2015-08-15
Knowing science teachers like I do, I’m not surprised to see that they express a gamut of emotions and have some really innovative ideas about how to prepare for going back to school. A completely unscientific survey of the Twittersphere reveals a few gems that may help science teachers everywhere—or at least bring a smile to a few faces!
ICYMI: Teachers Gear up For #NGSS http://t.co/Z3ztxPrdhZ @TdiShelton #ngsschat
— Melissa Stugart (@MelissaStugart) August 14, 2015
The cats do not understand getting ready for the start of the school year. They have closed my laptop & are revolting.
— Alyson Beecher (@alybee930) August 15, 2015
Released the spider at school by my room. #spider#spiders#Bugs#insects#scienceisawesome#science… https://t.co/kNGLmfKllz
— Adam Taylor (@2footgiraffe) August 14, 2015
Lights, Camera, Learn: What are Engineers? #pictureperfectscience #nsta #studio214 http://t.co/Mf0vAxfJBu
— Andrea Parson (@ParsonAndrea) August 16, 2015
A. Simpson (Keheley) & C. Garvin (Vaughan) at Mickelson ExxonMobil Teachers Academy! #stemcobb #MEMTA2015 pic.twitter.com/RGhuphkQl7
— STEM Cobb (@STEMcobb) July 31, 2015
I need to admit something….. I am an NSTA nerd. 🙂 @NSTA #summer #teacherlife pic.twitter.com/ymGzwdEzao
— Holly Neill (@homelifescience) August 14, 2015
“So it appears that now I’m a chemistry teacher…” Have any advice or tips for this teacher? http://t.co/TehutOhdsB #chemchat #NGSS
— IT’S ABOUT TIME® (@ItsAboutTimeEDU) August 14, 2015
A teensy supermassive black hole on @nytimes Summer of Science series: http://t.co/1YWd6l0THY by @overbye#scichatpic.twitter.com/ulb9BCw27s
— Kim Kowal Arcand (@kimberlykowal) August 15, 2015
Tips for the First Days of School: The August issue of Book Beat is full of them! http://t.co/DlUP27WQU6#NSTApic.twitter.com/AXdGtGuhhd
— NatSciTeachAssoc (@NSTA) August 15, 2015
A #science discussion students will love: What “Inside Out” Got Wrong http://t.co/LUGDMoYm7W#scichat
— Curriculet (@curriculet) August 14, 2015
Set classroom culture with a classroom pledge #TchTogether http://t.co/VTuWLujrGq pic.twitter.com/ZEZqzxE5iS
— Teaching Channel (@TeachingChannel) August 15, 2015
Education-focused media: Come to @NASA_Johnson Sept. 15-16 to learn about #YearInSpace. http://t.co/ZUe7oWusl9 pic.twitter.com/6DgQpHCDfF
— Intl. Space Station (@Space_Station) August 15, 2015
Already registered #NSTA15 Reno! Can’t wait https://t.co/qcuBEwEnE8
— Jen Gutierrez (@jengutierrez18) July 26, 2015
<
p dir="ltr" lang="en">NEW: Teach Climate Change Through Positive Action. #scichat #NSTA #ActOnClimate @naesp #mschat http://t.co/i0YibL0duA pic.twitter.com/aTp1jbheJP
— MiddleWeb (@middleweb) August 16, 2015
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Follow NSTA
Knowing science teachers like I do, I’m not surprised to see that they express a gamut of emotions and have some really innovative ideas about how to prepare for going back to school. A completely unscientific survey of the Twittersphere reveals a few gems that may help science teachers everywhere—or at least bring a smile to a few faces!
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2015-08-12
We’re a 1:1 school, and all of my students have access to iPads in class. I’m thinking of transitioning from hard-copy notebooks to electronic notebooks. My students are not thrilled with this. —R., New York
In a previous blog/column, Mary Morgan, a science teacher at Belton High School in Belton, Texas, shared her thoughts on interactive science notebooks. She also has experience with electronic formats, and here she shares her thoughts on electronic notebooking:
I have used INBs (Interactive Notebooks) for the last eight of the nine years I’ve been teaching, for all levels of biology. I’ve toyed with the idea of an electronic interactive notebook, (my school is a 1:1 iPad school), but I just can’t see myself completely transitioning to full iPad interactive notebooks anytime soon.
First, I’ve searched for a program or app that would help students organize the notebook, but I can’t find anything I like. (If I could find something I would certainly give it a pilot run with one of my classes—My pre-AP students are pretty resilient to any pilot programs that might not be successful or have some bumps along the way.)
For example, Google docs and LiveBinders are great, but don’t give the organized notebook “feel.” By notebook “feel” I mean that I like the students to be able to see their notes while they are doing the processing piece on the right side. When they are studying they can have multiple documents “open” in the notebook at the same time (using the flip-ups and right/left side model) which cannot yet be achieved on the iPad. (If we had laptops, I might be more inclined, but I haven’t found anything yet for the iPad. I’m open to suggestions!)
Also, I’ve done some straw-polls with my students (no official, scientific research other than papers I’ve read from others on the topic) and the vast majority of them (usually about 98-99% each year) do not like putting their notes on their iPads. When I go further with the questioning, those who have tried taking notes on the iPad say they never go back and study them because they are hard to find, and they’re distracted by the games and apps that are readily available.
I did allow students to do their notes on their iPads last year if they wanted (they could choose the app -— Goodnotes, Evernote, Notepad, uPad, etc.), but still had to do Cornell style. They come from fully restricted iPads at middle school to unrestricted at high school, so they get really excited about them when they first have them in September. Many started off doing them on the iPad, but by the end of the year had transitioned back to the paper notebook. I think they liked the novelty of the notes on iPad, but they soon realized they were more apt to study the notes and they were easier to access and use for activities/labs/processing when they did them on paper.
Also, I ran into students who weren’t actually copying or writing notes, but instead they were taking photos of presentation slides. This is absolutely not helpful! They never looked back at them and couldn’t find what they needed among the 1000’s of photos. This was a huge issue for both studying and copyright.
My experience is, while copying notes is certainly not the best way to learn (I always have a processing piece to go with the notes so they are forced to wrestle with the information), there is something to the writing part that helps the information start to stick in the brain, at least in the short term memory. However, taking a photo of the notes doesn’t even start the memory firing at all, so this is just rubbish. I allow students to take photos of instructions for lab directions but not their notes. Plus, I post all of our notes on Homeroom, so they have access to the videos/animations/pictures/links/info outside of class.
This year, I did not allow notes on the iPads, unless they first took them in the INB and then copied them to the iPad, which became a good study tool for some. (It was the same as copying paper notes to paper, but with the tech aspect making it more exciting, I guess.)
This is not to say that I do not incorporate the iPad into the INB experience. We use iPads quite often in my classroom. We use online videos (I’ve even created a few of my own!), do web quests, play science learning apps, play study games, take quizzes on Socrative, complete and submit assignments on Homeroom, and create products like videos and infographics on the iPad for various projects. In addition, students look up answers to questions they have and access their textbooks through their iPads. I took a number of classes this summer on App Smashing and Augmented Reality, so I am very excited to begin incorporating these techniques into my classroom this year as well! For my students and I, technology opens up the learning field and creates a wider world in which to study science. For example, instead of simply describing what Darwin found in the Galapagos Islands, we can use Google Earth and actually visit the islands! Or, we can visit virtual museum exhibits to determine how the body systems interact or see the macromolecules in action inside of an organism! In my classroom, the iPads and notebooks are used side-by-side and it seems to work out quite well for the students.
Note:
Photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fhke/4509556824/sizes/l