Skip to main content
 

Posing investigable questions

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2010-12-12

S&C Cover

Click here for the Table of Contents


In the classroom, we are often so focused on answers that we forget to ask the right questions. The teacher is often the one asking questions, but in this issue the theme is on helping students to ask questions that can be the basis for inquiry-based investigations.
In many workshops that I’ve done, I’ve given teachers a brief, relevant article and asked them to highlight 3-4 sentences that resonate with them—that are worth remembering or discussing. In the guest editorial Sparks That Ignite Inquiry, I would have highlighted these (which ones work for you?):

  • Teachers are powerful models if they demonstrate what they ask students to do.
  • Teachers can increase the likelihood that students will ask investigable questions by providing hands-on experiences using provocative materials.
  • It is sometimes difficult for teachers to enable students to think for themselves because a pervasive philosophy underpinning much of American education is that school experiences should pass on knowledge that has already been learned.
  • Learning is a lifelong set of experiences—throughout most of our lives we do not have a teacher to guide us. Successful adults have confidence in their own ability to ask questions and to further their knowledge through various means of inquiry.

I heard a teacher say once that her ninth-grade students weren’t mature enough for inquiry learning. I hope she looks at the articles in this issue that show how younger students are indeed capable of asking investigable questions, given guidance and scaffolding by the teacher. Thought-Provoking Questions has sample lessons (for K-3 and 4-6) on generating questions. Ready…Set…Go has a lesson idea in which 4th graders learned about testable questions in an active, game-like setting.
Children ask lots of questions already, so even kindergarten students can be part of the process, too.

Investigable Questions includes a lesson that shows how to turn the traditional growing-beans-in-a-cup into a fair-test investigation. Curiosity + Kindergarten = Future Scientists shows how even something as simple as an egg can be used to stimulate curiosity when the teacher responds to a question, not with an answer, but with “How can we find out?”
I think a lot of confusion results from not having a common language or definitions during a discussion. Attending a Science Institute describes how teachers differentiated between investigable questions and “I wonder” questions. There is also a discussion of how to help students learn to ask investigable questions: from giving examples to selecting one from a list of 3-4 to creating their own. “Hypothesis” is another word with many interpretations (I grit my teeth when I hear that it’s an “educated guess.”) To Hypothesize or Not discusses what a hypothesis is (and is not). It has a probe that can be used to assess your students’ (and your own) knowledge of hypotheses. I’d recommend this article and probe (a downloadable version is available) for teachers of any grade level.
A Quest to Improve describes similar categories of questions: philosophical questions that cannot be answered by science, questions regarding facts (names, size, definitions), and complex questions that need tweaking or fine-tuning in order to be investigable. The author describes and provides examples of investigable questions: descriptive, relational, and cause-effect. Also included are suggestions for science notebooks and a checklist for evaluating questions.
Personalized Inquiry describes classifying questions into three categories, based on how they might be answered: observational studies, experimentation, or finding the answers in the literature. A fourth category is for questions than cannot be answered scientifically. (Note: for questions literature-based questions, the websites in SciLinks could be useful to recommend to students.) The author includes examples of each and a set of lessons on generating questions. The “personalized” in the title refers to the fact that each student contributes a question to the list.


Current events in children’s lives can lead to investigable questions, too. In Learning from the Oil Spill, the author describes a three-week unit in which students investigate oil spills and cleanup methods. She provides a sample lesson to address the question: How can oil from a disastrous spill be contained and removed effectively from a large body of water? During the time of the spill, there were many online resources and updates to help students understand the impact of the situation. The recently announced Online Clearinghouse for Education And Networking – Oil Interdisciplinary Learning (OCEAN-OIL) is just that – a collection of reviewed images, articles, and other content. If you’d like to compare the 2010 spill to a previous one, NOAA has created a comprehensive look at the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William’s Oily Mess This site is designed as a classroom resource with lesson plans, inquiry activities in a real-world context, photographs, readings, and interviews with scientists.
What Causes Things to Rust? has background information on the process. It’s a good introduction to Picture This!, which describes how first-graders use digital cameras to collect data to form questions and to investigate their questions.
SciLinks connections for content topics mentioned in the articles:

And check out more Connections for this issue. Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, there are ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, and other resources.

S&C Cover

Click here for the Table of Contents

 

NSTA responds to PISA results

By NSTA Web Director

Posted on 2010-12-08

NSTA has released the following statement regarding the results of the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment Report (PISA):

The National Science Teachers Association is cautiously optimistic and somewhat surprised in the results for Science in the PISA Report. We are cautiously optimistic in that average science scores are up from 2006; however, this growth only puts the U.S. from the lower middle to the middle of the pack. We are still behind 18 countries and only 29 percent of students tested showed proficiency in science.
We are surprised at the scores because a very limited investment has been made on a national level in training and retaining science teachers. We believe that test scores for our students could be significantly improved if schools, states, and the federal government would commit to a larger investment in science teaching and learning.
As this report shows, our international neighbors are making the investment in science education. Our ability as a nation to remain competitive with other countries is dependent on how well we educate our children in science and mathematics. We hope this report will generate more public discussion about the need to make the necessary investments in science education.

NSTA has released the following statement regarding the results of the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment Report (PISA):

 

When your students don't know what to do …

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2010-12-01

At the beginning of the year, I covered measurement, basic equipment, and other fundamentals I thought my students (seventh graders) needed before we started our labs. Now they seem to have forgotten everything and need to be taught this information again whenever we do a lab. What can I do to help them remember?
—Diane, Las Cruces, New Mexico
The first textbook I used had a chapter devoted to the metric system, so I dutifully “covered” it at the beginning of the year, with its emphasis on converting units. Following the advice of a colleague, I also had the students memorize the names of equipment (flasks, graduated cylinders, forceps, and so on) before they had a chance to use them. What a disaster! When it was time to use these concepts, skills, and vocabulary in subsequent lab activities, my middle-school students remembered little of what they had supposedly learned.
As I reflected on this, I realized I had expected the students to master these concepts and vocabulary without any meaningful context. It seemed difficult for them to apply procedures that had been introduced at the beginning of the year to a lab weeks later. I was certainly teaching the material (with the lesson plans to prove it), and the students seemed to know the material at the time—but they weren’t learning it well enough to apply it to new activities.
So I changed my approach.

I introduced lab-related concepts, procedures, and vocabulary on an as-needed basis within the context of investigations, rather than in isolated units of instruction. For example, the students learned how to use microscopes in the context of a unit on microbiology. They practiced focusing microscopes while examining prepared slides of cells. They made their own wet mount slides of algae, yeasts, and molds. They examined pond water and recorded their observations and inferences.
This worked well, but we still want students to connect what they learn to their previous experience and to transfer what they learn to new situations. When students are learning new lab procedures, you could have them create their own frequently asked questions, or FAQs. They could designate a section of their science notebooks for FAQs such as How do I use a balance? How do I make a wet mount microscope slide? What should I use to measure the volume of a liquid? What is the difference between an observation and an inference? The question is followed by a brief, step-by-step response or definition, including diagrams or pictures. Each student would be responsible for adding questions to his or her notebook. If the notebooks have a “glossary” section, students could add descriptions and sketches of equipment as they use it. This becomes a reference to use during a lab.
A variation is to provide index cards on which students write the questions. Punch a hole in the card and add it to a ring with other cards or to a binder. Keep a set at each lab station, and allow students to add to the set as the year progresses. There could also be cards on which students write names and draw diagrams of the equipment and materials they use (e.g., a glassware card) for future reference. During a lab, students can flip through the cards if they have questions (you may need to model this strategy for the students to help them become more self-sufficient).
You could make the cards, but it would be more meaningful if the students make the cards themselves and use their own words in the responses. Perhaps creating the cards could be one of the roles you assign in cooperative groups or at the end of a unit as a review. Each class period could add to the set, and the students can learn from each other’s questions. At the end of the year, you could give the card sets to the eighth grade teacher for the students to continue to use.
Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkfid/4333769080/in/photostream/

At the beginning of the year, I covered measurement, basic equipment, and other fundamentals I thought my students (seventh graders) needed before we started our labs. Now they seem to have forgotten everything and need to be taught this information again whenever we do a lab. What can I do to help them remember?
—Diane, Las Cruces, New Mexico

 

Shanghai video diary

By NSTA Web Director

Posted on 2010-11-29

William D. Greene of West Virginia participated in the recent Sino-US Science and Education Forum and has posted this video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV3xlBynU6M[/youtube]
Click on the tag below to see more blog posts on this subject.

William D. Greene of West Virginia participated in the recent Sino-US Science and Education Forum and has posted this video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV3xlBynU6M[/youtube]
Click on the tag below to see more blog posts on this subject.

 

Science notebooks

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2010-11-26

Click here for the Table of Contents


Several years ago at an NSTA conference, I attended several sessions on science notebooks. I always required my students to keep (and use) a science notebook, but these sessions had some different extensions and variations that made me an even bigger fan. So I was really interested to see an entire issue devoted to this learning strategy. As a secondary teacher, when I read the articles, I visualized how the ideas could apply to older students.
The current thinking on notebooks is that they are more than a collection of handouts and notes copied from the board and organized in a way determined by the teacher. Notebooks are less about organizing “stuff” and more about organizing thoughts, writing about what the student is learning rather than what the student was told to do.
In Making Meaning with Notebooks, Michael Klentschy (the author of Using Science Notebooks in Elementary Classrooms and Using Science Notebooks in Middle School) describes a notebook as … the student’s personal record that can be referred to and updated throughout an investigation or even an entire unit of study. Whether for scientists or students, a science notebook records what was observed or done and what the scientists or students thought as a result of the experience.

Throughout these articles, scaffolding seems to be a theme. For example, A Menu of Options has suggestions for starting notebooks with primary students. I suspect that at the beginning of middle school and then again in high school, teachers would also have to model the process and guide students to help them progress to more advanced thinking and strategies.  (Note: Check SciLinks for additional content resources on Butterflies (K–4 and 5–8) and metamorphosis.)
Nonfiction Literacy in Kindergarten shows how to incorporate nonfiction features such as a table of contents, a labeled diagram, a text box, or a graph in student notebooks to reinforce concepts from reading instruction. There are examples of how the teacher used the notebooks as a formative assessment. Reuse That Notebook describes how teachers in grades 3–6 designed a process for the same notebook to be used throughout the grades. They shared the assessment rubric they developed as a team, and I was impressed that “neatness” and “following directions” (although important) are not included in this science rubric (but they do appear in the self-assessment rubric). Using the same notebook in the following years—what a great record of learning!
Reading Graphically Enhanced Science Notebooks brought back some memories. During a test, a student came to me and asked if instead of writing a description of how cepahalopods move, could he draw a picture? His diagram showed that he understood the concept, as opposed to just memorizing the words “jet propulsion.” This article has several student examples – not just labeled diagrams or tables of numbers but student-generated explanations of processes or events in a graphic format.  The examples are related to magnets. How do oil and gas companies know where to drill? also has some examples of graphics, with illustrations of sending shock waves beneath the Earth’s surface and recording the resulting reflections.
All inquiry starts with a question, but to generate a question a student must have some prior knowledge about the subject. A Laboratory of Words shows how adding a “quick write” to notebooks can help the students to express their prior knowledge (or misconceptions). The article describes how to model the quick write (often used as a bell-ringer). Based on the other artidles, I’m thinking that “quick draws” could also be used.
Learning English–Learning Science adds a family component to the process, using resources form the  Lawrence Hall of Science’s Mateo y Cientina, and  looks at student writing as a way to assess English learning as well as science. In Nature Detectives, students do ongoing observations in the schoolyard or neighborhood and create a field guide. Take a look at Making Tracks Trail Guide, a do-it-yourself project.
SciLinks has resources that could supplement the content in several of this issue’s articles. Documenting Learning has activities for younger students on Properties of Sand, Salt, and Water  related to solubility, and Does It Have a Life Cycle describes an assessment probe that could help the teacher discover conceptions and misconceptions that students have on the topic of life cycles.
Interactive Reflective Logs illustrates getting and providing feedback via the notebook (with sample pages) as students and teachers act as reflective partners. The article models how to give and respond to feedback.
Some addition resources on science notebooks include

NSTA Journals have published many articles related to science notebooks. Click here for a collection of articles and free book chapters that I assembled using the NSTA Learning Center’s My Resource Center tool.

Seasons Change lists many useful websites. I was reading the PDF version of the article, and when I clicked on the URLs I did not get the sites. Aha—the article is formatted into three narrow columns, and the URLs wrap around to the next line. So here are the sites mentioned in the article:


And check out the Connections for this issue. Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, there are ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, and other resources.

Click here for the Table of Contents

 

A not-so-simple question

By Francis Eberle

Posted on 2010-11-23

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle


With the NSTA delegation to the Sino–US Science and Education Forum back in the U.S., I am sure each member will be asked what I have been asked several times since returning home. “How was China?” This may seem to be a simple question. China is a place of contrasts: the new and the old China; rural and urban China; educated and non-educated China. During the trip I finished a book called Country Driving; A Journey Through China From Farm To Factory, and I may have blurred my thoughts with those of the book’s author, Peter Hessler. But in this final reflection I want to tell you in advance that I will use some of his thoughts to illustrate my overall impressions. I welcome your thoughts too.
From a science education perspective China’s goals and efforts to secure a quality science education for students are similar to ours. They want more inquiry used in classrooms, more high quality materials, and more qualified instructors. These are critical to improving science education, but the scale in China is enormous. The impression you get is they are not close to achieving these goals right now.
The advantage they do have is something that at times seems lacking in the U.S. The Chinese have aspirations for a systematic approach to improve what they are doing. I believe this is one of the purposes for inviting NSTA to their country to build relationships and to improve their science education process. Education is the route to success. After he slept in a fourth grade classroom in the rural town of Xiakou, Peter Hessler found the following quotes on the walls: Study hard so China can rise up;  A man with knowledge turns into three heads and six arms; and men and machines are the same if they keep moving, they don’t rust.
They have a long way to go to improve their science education system, but they do seem determined. The tour guide told us that twenty years ago the city of Shanghai had only one building that was higher than 30 floors, and now there are 128 buildings over 30 floors in just one neighborhood of Shanghai. There are many neighborhoods in Shanghai. They are growing whether they want to or not.
Part of my lesson from this trip is to find ways to use the influence of NSTA to improve the focus on the U.S. government on science education here. And you can help by contacting your state representative(s). This process is very different from the Chinese approach, and I still think it is better even though slower.  We need to speak up. After what our delegation saw and learned, we cannot stand still, because China is certainly not standing still.
Addendum—17 December 2010: NSTA Press author Steve Rich was part of the U.S. delegation in Shanghai and has shared his reflections about his experience in China.

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

 

Homeward bound

By NSTA Web Director

Posted on 2010-11-23

Dr. Christine Royce muses about “time travel” and her recent experiences at the Sino–US Science and Education Forum in Shanghai.


Sunday, November 21, 2010

Sun through the hazeWell, it’s “Back to the Future.” Just as we had all come together in singles, forming groups of two or three, so did we disperse. Due to different flights, we met in the lobby of the hotel at different times (mine being 5:45 a.m.) and were shuttled to the airport with people who were returning to the same city with us. There was no large group good bye, there was no ending group hug, but rather each of us heading back to our respective cities from whence we came. We left on Sunday morning, Shanghai time, and according to the flight itinerary we arrived an hour later Detroit time. Not quite that quick of a trip, but due to the time difference we were literally going “back to the future.” We were going “back” due to the difference in time and location of the time zones, yet we were returning to our future. More knowledgeable about our counterparts in China and with a greater understanding of the people that we met and their intricate culture which is multifaceted.
When we reached Detroit (or LA or Chicago or wherever each plane was headed) we returned to being an individual or pair headed for their own gate—to return to Wisconsin, or DC, or in my case Shippensburg. The group disbanded physically in a rather quick manner however I think that many of us will be the “sticky rice” that was referenced earlier and keep in touch. After all, each of us has a commonality that binds us together—the pursuit of excellence in science education in order to improve the education of our students whatever the level. This pursuit in itself impacts the future of not only the country in which we live—but also countries around the world as we realized by working with our friends, colleagues and counterparts from half way across the world.
Part of the US contingent at the Sino-US Science and Education Forum in Shanghai

Dr. Christine Royce muses about “time travel” and her recent experiences at the Sino–US Science and Education Forum in Shanghai.


Sunday, November 21, 2010

 

Old and “old” in China

By NSTA Web Director

Posted on 2010-11-23

Dr. Christine Royce notes that there is old, and then there is old. And also “old.” China has all three, and the new as well, in a heady mix.


Saturday, November 20, 2010

Today we spent the day being “tourists”—and doing all of the things that tourists do—visit sights, shop, eat in good restaurants, shop, board more busses to go to the museum, shop etc. In the past few days we had heard about the “old traditions” of schooling, approaches to instruction, and the mindset of the people as well as the new traditions related to the same topics. Jennifer at one point discussed with us how the influx of money has influenced the people of China. Today was a great example of how old traditions collided with new traditions.
The first part of the morning was a visit to the Jade Buddha Temple, which housed an extremely large Buddha made of a single piece of Jade (thus the name). When entering the temple, it was packed, people purchasing incense of sheets to write wishes on and burn; others folding “money” or at least paper meant to represent money to burn for their ancestors in the afterlife; others were praying. Contrasted with these old traditions, were the new ones—people rushing back and forth snapping pictures; those moving in and out of the myriad of shops. Where old meets new would have been a way to describe the clothing that people wore also—some young people wore stiletto heels on knee high boots where some people who could be my grandparents wore the flat shoes and attire that was reserved and modest. Somehow all of them did have a similar purpose for being there—remembrance of their ancestors and the continuation of sending wishes and good will to them in the offerings they made.

no images were found



Lunch was in Nanshi Old Town, which Jennifer the tour guide called “China Town”—it is a small village that looked old based on the decor, roof structure, winding paths, and stone walks, however it is relatively new construction—made to look old. One could find anything possible to purchase in this area as well—and it was packed! Today was truly the first day I could feel how many people truly occupied this city based on the street traffic. It was neat to see the “old” structures and have a sense of what construction may have looked like in years gone by. It was also fun to wander in and out of the shops trying to decide what gift to bring home for that friend or relative.
In America, we think old is during the days of the Pilgrims or Colonial Williamsburg, or even during the Civil War. We visit museums and see weaponry constructed during these periods or listen to speeches given by our past presidents. Let’s see that takes us back two, maybe three centuries? As Americans, we have no clue what “old” is until you visit a place like the Shanghai Museum that had pottery dating back to the 1200s. While we didn’t have much time in the museum, we were able to visit a gallery or two and truly have an appreciation for the artistic talents of the people of this country—even hundreds of years ago. All of these original antiques were housed in a beautiful new structure that represented the modern age while at the same time providing almost a reverence for the historical treasures housed here.
Finally, we went to THE SHOPPING STREET of all of China—Nanjing Road. If I thought I felt crowded earlier, this was a wake-up call. You could barely move down the street. I literally got swept up with the flow of the crowd moving from store to store and occasionally had to break free to do some shopping of my own. My purchase this evening—pearls. One colleague on the trip commented that there probably wasn’t a lady in the group who didn’t stop to at least admire the jewels of the sea. Jennifer’s point of the influx of money and the materialistic aspects of some young people rang true on this street. While there were many foreigners among them, it was clear that shopping had its place in the modern world as well.
Old and new, a clash of cultures in a way, but nonetheless both part of the modern China that we had the opportunity to explore over the past few days.

Dr. Christine Royce notes that there is old, and then there is old. And also “old.” China has all three, and the new as well, in a heady mix.


Saturday, November 20, 2010

 

Inquiry across the science disciplines

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2010-11-22

Click here for the Table of Contents


Inquiry seems like one of those words that as my seventh-graders would say “I know what it means, but it’s hard to ‘splain.” Rather than an inquiry/not inquiry dichotomy, many of the articles in this issue describe inquiry as happening along a continuum, from “teacher-directed low-inquiry activities to open-inquiry investigations in which students generate their own questions and design their own experiments.” In working with teachers, some of the big aha moments occur when they realize that hands-on activities are not necessarily inquiry and that inquiry does not mean that students are not given any guidance or support during their investigations.
In his column, the editor mentions two notable articles on the topic of inquiry: Simplifying Inquiry Instruction and Laboratory Instruction in the Service of Science Teaching and Learning. Both of these (along with others on the topic) were in the October 2005 issue of The Science Teacher and are well worth a reread.
If you’re not sure where to start, take a look at The Inquiry Matrix, which has a tool for planning and reflecting on inquiry activities. (In looking at this, I wonder how many of our activities are at the “least complex” side of the spectrum). This could be a great rubric to track how class activities become more inquiry-based as the students learn the skills and as they (and their teachers) become more confident.

A Template for Open Inquiry describes a continuum of inquiry features (including a graphic that should be in every teachers notebook) in terms of the inverse relationship between learner self-direction and teacher directions/input. The authors use a real-life example from an earth science class on impact craters to illustrate the process.
Several articles describe what inquiry looks like in the context of other science classes. But regardless of what subject you teach, there are take-away ideas for enhancing any subject:

  • Model-Based Inquiry focuses on the concept of buoyancy in a physics class and includes examples of student work and a concept map.
  • Sugar Cube Science turns a simple activity on solubility into a inquiry activity in which students are provided with “Design-a-Lab” guidelines and a rubric.
  • Exploring Osmosis & Diffusion in Cells illustrates a guided–inquiry activity and includes an investigation proposal graphic organizer that could be used for other topics, in addition to this study of osmosis and diffusion. It’s also interesting to read how this activity was developed and fine-tuned as part of a lesson-study professional development project.

When I read The Inquiry Flame, I had a flashback to my methods course. Our introduction to teaching via inquiry was with a candle. This enhanced version shows how teachers can scaffold (or guide) the process to help students design and organize their experiments. The article includes several graphic organizers that could be used in other contexts.
In the Science 2.0 column Instant Inquiry, the author describes the value of studying slow-motion images and directions for using high-speed cameras to create these images as part of student investigations. A useful site on photographic images is Molecular Expressions from the Florida State University. Many of the individual sections are in the SciLinks database already, but the main site shows the extent of the collections.
I know a teacher who uses Headline Science as supplemental readings for students. These brief updates describe what is being learned from current research projects. For many of these topics, there are related SciLinks if students are interested in more information:

Have you been reading this year’s Science & Children? Each issue is themed around aspects of inquiry learning. It’s great to read about what younger students are doing.
Check out the Connections for this issue (November 2010). Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, this resource has ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, etc.

Click here for the Table of Contents

 

Exploring Shanghai

By Francis Eberle

Posted on 2010-11-22

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle


The final day in Shanghai was busy and we all had to be, as our guide put it, “sticky rice and not loose noodles.” After breakfast we left for the Jade Buddhist Temple, then went on to a silk factory, ate lunch before heading to do some quick shopping in old Shanghai, then off to the Shanghai museum, with more shopping at the “knock off” market, before we finally had dinner. No one complained since we knew we could sleep on the 15-hour trip home the next day.
The Jade Buddhist Temple was spectacular. Our visit coincided with one of the two (I think) worship days each month, and the place was packed. People were worshiping, making wishes, burning incense, burning their wishes in large fires and generally milling around in the various rooms with a Buddha. There was quite an excited air in the room. We were able to view the Jade Buddha, with people worshiping there. People also bought oil to keep there lamps burning in support of the Buddha as they stood in front of the Buddha and made their silent prayers.

no images were found



Outside in the courtyard, someone in our group and I were approached by a young man with identification around his neck indicating that he worked in the temple. He wanted us to rub the fat Buddha’s belly for good luck. He took us to another quiet room on the second floor of one of the buildings to rub the Buddha’s stomach, which we both did and took pictures. (The sign next to the Buddha said taking photos was prohibited.) He then showed us around the little exhibit area and tried to persuade us that we should buy several items. We didn’t and he seemed very disappointed.
We then went to the silk factory where the factory docent talked about the silk making process—by caterpillars—and the spinning process—by people, or machines in this case. There are two kinds of cocoons and one is used for threads—the single cocoon- and the other one—the double cocoon—is used for quilts. (The thread is continuous in the single cocoon but not with the double cocoon.) The docent then took us into the factor store room and told us the benefit of silk as compared to other fabrics. (She too was very persuasive about how we would be so happy if we bought some silk.)
After lunch we visited the Shanghai museum and learned more about China’s history. This museum had an array of amazing displays of old art, furniture, sculpture and ceramics. I have a nephew who is a potter, so I focused mostly on the pottery and ceramics. There were pots that were made in 236 AD that were quite spectacular.
To wrap up the day, a few people continued their shopping and we all met for dinner. For our last dinner in China we were ready but not exactly prepared for the upcoming treat planned for us. We were placed in a very large dining room hall which was separated by a six-foot removable wall. On the other half of the hall there was a large birthday party for a man who was turning 50. Our guide said usually the Chinese don’t celebrate with such a large group until the person turns 80, 90, or 100. There was very loud music—so loud you couldn’t talk at the tables–as well as balancing acts and singing. Someone at our table said you could have changed the words on the projector screen to Spanish and you could have been in Mexico. During the mayhem of noise and celebration someone in our group was able to obtain some of the birthday cake, which resulted in many of the birthday guests joining our tables for cake, cheers, and pictures. This was an unexpected cultural lesson for us in a changing China. Happy, commercial, and loud. Sound familiar? Happy Birthday, China.

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

Subscribe to
Asset 2