By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2010-12-12
Click here for the Table of Contents
I heard a teacher say once that her ninth-grade students weren’t mature enough for inquiry learning. I hope she looks at the articles in this issue that show how younger students are indeed capable of asking investigable questions, given guidance and scaffolding by the teacher. Thought-Provoking Questions has sample lessons (for K-3 and 4-6) on generating questions. Ready…Set…Go has a lesson idea in which 4th graders learned about testable questions in an active, game-like setting.
Children ask lots of questions already, so even kindergarten students can be part of the process, too.
Investigable Questions includes a lesson that shows how to turn the traditional growing-beans-in-a-cup into a fair-test investigation. Curiosity + Kindergarten = Future Scientists shows how even something as simple as an egg can be used to stimulate curiosity when the teacher responds to a question, not with an answer, but with “How can we find out?”
I think a lot of confusion results from not having a common language or definitions during a discussion. Attending a Science Institute describes how teachers differentiated between investigable questions and “I wonder” questions. There is also a discussion of how to help students learn to ask investigable questions: from giving examples to selecting one from a list of 3-4 to creating their own. “Hypothesis” is another word with many interpretations (I grit my teeth when I hear that it’s an “educated guess.”) To Hypothesize or Not discusses what a hypothesis is (and is not). It has a probe that can be used to assess your students’ (and your own) knowledge of hypotheses. I’d recommend this article and probe (a downloadable version is available) for teachers of any grade level.
A Quest to Improve describes similar categories of questions: philosophical questions that cannot be answered by science, questions regarding facts (names, size, definitions), and complex questions that need tweaking or fine-tuning in order to be investigable. The author describes and provides examples of investigable questions: descriptive, relational, and cause-effect. Also included are suggestions for science notebooks and a checklist for evaluating questions.
Personalized Inquiry describes classifying questions into three categories, based on how they might be answered: observational studies, experimentation, or finding the answers in the literature. A fourth category is for questions than cannot be answered scientifically. (Note: for questions literature-based questions, the websites in SciLinks could be useful to recommend to students.) The author includes examples of each and a set of lessons on generating questions. The “personalized” in the title refers to the fact that each student contributes a question to the list.
Current events in children’s lives can lead to investigable questions, too. In Learning from the Oil Spill, the author describes a three-week unit in which students investigate oil spills and cleanup methods. She provides a sample lesson to address the question: How can oil from a disastrous spill be contained and removed effectively from a large body of water? During the time of the spill, there were many online resources and updates to help students understand the impact of the situation. The recently announced Online Clearinghouse for Education And Networking – Oil Interdisciplinary Learning (OCEAN-OIL) is just that – a collection of reviewed images, articles, and other content. If you’d like to compare the 2010 spill to a previous one, NOAA has created a comprehensive look at the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William’s Oily Mess This site is designed as a classroom resource with lesson plans, inquiry activities in a real-world context, photographs, readings, and interviews with scientists.
What Causes Things to Rust? has background information on the process. It’s a good introduction to Picture This!, which describes how first-graders use digital cameras to collect data to form questions and to investigate their questions.
SciLinks connections for content topics mentioned in the articles:
And check out more Connections for this issue. Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, there are ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, and other resources.
Click here for the Table of Contents
By NSTA Web Director
Posted on 2010-12-08
NSTA has released the following statement regarding the results of the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment Report (PISA):
The National Science Teachers Association is cautiously optimistic and somewhat surprised in the results for Science in the PISA Report. We are cautiously optimistic in that average science scores are up from 2006; however, this growth only puts the U.S. from the lower middle to the middle of the pack. We are still behind 18 countries and only 29 percent of students tested showed proficiency in science.
We are surprised at the scores because a very limited investment has been made on a national level in training and retaining science teachers. We believe that test scores for our students could be significantly improved if schools, states, and the federal government would commit to a larger investment in science teaching and learning.
As this report shows, our international neighbors are making the investment in science education. Our ability as a nation to remain competitive with other countries is dependent on how well we educate our children in science and mathematics. We hope this report will generate more public discussion about the need to make the necessary investments in science education.
NSTA has released the following statement regarding the results of the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment Report (PISA):
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2010-12-01
At the beginning of the year, I covered measurement, basic equipment, and other fundamentals I thought my students (seventh graders) needed before we started our labs. Now they seem to have forgotten everything and need to be taught this information again whenever we do a lab. What can I do to help them remember?
—Diane, Las Cruces, New Mexico
The first textbook I used had a chapter devoted to the metric system, so I dutifully “covered” it at the beginning of the year, with its emphasis on converting units. Following the advice of a colleague, I also had the students memorize the names of equipment (flasks, graduated cylinders, forceps, and so on) before they had a chance to use them. What a disaster! When it was time to use these concepts, skills, and vocabulary in subsequent lab activities, my middle-school students remembered little of what they had supposedly learned.
As I reflected on this, I realized I had expected the students to master these concepts and vocabulary without any meaningful context. It seemed difficult for them to apply procedures that had been introduced at the beginning of the year to a lab weeks later. I was certainly teaching the material (with the lesson plans to prove it), and the students seemed to know the material at the time—but they weren’t learning it well enough to apply it to new activities.
So I changed my approach.
I introduced lab-related concepts, procedures, and vocabulary on an as-needed basis within the context of investigations, rather than in isolated units of instruction. For example, the students learned how to use microscopes in the context of a unit on microbiology. They practiced focusing microscopes while examining prepared slides of cells. They made their own wet mount slides of algae, yeasts, and molds. They examined pond water and recorded their observations and inferences.
This worked well, but we still want students to connect what they learn to their previous experience and to transfer what they learn to new situations. When students are learning new lab procedures, you could have them create their own frequently asked questions, or FAQs. They could designate a section of their science notebooks for FAQs such as How do I use a balance? How do I make a wet mount microscope slide? What should I use to measure the volume of a liquid? What is the difference between an observation and an inference? The question is followed by a brief, step-by-step response or definition, including diagrams or pictures. Each student would be responsible for adding questions to his or her notebook. If the notebooks have a “glossary” section, students could add descriptions and sketches of equipment as they use it. This becomes a reference to use during a lab.
A variation is to provide index cards on which students write the questions. Punch a hole in the card and add it to a ring with other cards or to a binder. Keep a set at each lab station, and allow students to add to the set as the year progresses. There could also be cards on which students write names and draw diagrams of the equipment and materials they use (e.g., a glassware card) for future reference. During a lab, students can flip through the cards if they have questions (you may need to model this strategy for the students to help them become more self-sufficient).
You could make the cards, but it would be more meaningful if the students make the cards themselves and use their own words in the responses. Perhaps creating the cards could be one of the roles you assign in cooperative groups or at the end of a unit as a review. Each class period could add to the set, and the students can learn from each other’s questions. At the end of the year, you could give the card sets to the eighth grade teacher for the students to continue to use.
Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jkfid/4333769080/in/photostream/
At the beginning of the year, I covered measurement, basic equipment, and other fundamentals I thought my students (seventh graders) needed before we started our labs. Now they seem to have forgotten everything and need to be taught this information again whenever we do a lab. What can I do to help them remember?
—Diane, Las Cruces, New Mexico
By NSTA Web Director
Posted on 2010-11-29
William D. Greene of West Virginia participated in the recent Sino-US Science and Education Forum and has posted this video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV3xlBynU6M[/youtube]
Click on the tag below to see more blog posts on this subject.
William D. Greene of West Virginia participated in the recent Sino-US Science and Education Forum and has posted this video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV3xlBynU6M[/youtube]
Click on the tag below to see more blog posts on this subject.
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2010-11-26
NSTA Journals have published many articles related to science notebooks. Click here for a collection of articles and free book chapters that I assembled using the NSTA Learning Center’s My Resource Center tool.
Seasons Change lists many useful websites. I was reading the PDF version of the article, and when I clicked on the URLs I did not get the sites. Aha—the article is formatted into three narrow columns, and the URLs wrap around to the next line. So here are the sites mentioned in the article:
And check out the Connections for this issue. Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, there are ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, and other resources.
By Francis Eberle
Posted on 2010-11-23
By NSTA Web Director
Posted on 2010-11-23
Dr. Christine Royce muses about “time travel” and her recent experiences at the Sino–US Science and Education Forum in Shanghai.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Well, it’s “Back to the Future.” Just as we had all come together in singles, forming groups of two or three, so did we disperse. Due to different flights, we met in the lobby of the hotel at different times (mine being 5:45 a.m.) and were shuttled to the airport with people who were returning to the same city with us. There was no large group good bye, there was no ending group hug, but rather each of us heading back to our respective cities from whence we came. We left on Sunday morning, Shanghai time, and according to the flight itinerary we arrived an hour later Detroit time. Not quite that quick of a trip, but due to the time difference we were literally going “back to the future.” We were going “back” due to the difference in time and location of the time zones, yet we were returning to our future. More knowledgeable about our counterparts in China and with a greater understanding of the people that we met and their intricate culture which is multifaceted.
When we reached Detroit (or LA or Chicago or wherever each plane was headed) we returned to being an individual or pair headed for their own gate—to return to Wisconsin, or DC, or in my case Shippensburg. The group disbanded physically in a rather quick manner however I think that many of us will be the “sticky rice” that was referenced earlier and keep in touch. After all, each of us has a commonality that binds us together—the pursuit of excellence in science education in order to improve the education of our students whatever the level. This pursuit in itself impacts the future of not only the country in which we live—but also countries around the world as we realized by working with our friends, colleagues and counterparts from half way across the world.
Dr. Christine Royce muses about “time travel” and her recent experiences at the Sino–US Science and Education Forum in Shanghai.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
By NSTA Web Director
Posted on 2010-11-23
Dr. Christine Royce notes that there is old, and then there is old. And also “old.” China has all three, and the new as well, in a heady mix.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Today we spent the day being “tourists”—and doing all of the things that tourists do—visit sights, shop, eat in good restaurants, shop, board more busses to go to the museum, shop etc. In the past few days we had heard about the “old traditions” of schooling, approaches to instruction, and the mindset of the people as well as the new traditions related to the same topics. Jennifer at one point discussed with us how the influx of money has influenced the people of China. Today was a great example of how old traditions collided with new traditions.
The first part of the morning was a visit to the Jade Buddha Temple, which housed an extremely large Buddha made of a single piece of Jade (thus the name). When entering the temple, it was packed, people purchasing incense of sheets to write wishes on and burn; others folding “money” or at least paper meant to represent money to burn for their ancestors in the afterlife; others were praying. Contrasted with these old traditions, were the new ones—people rushing back and forth snapping pictures; those moving in and out of the myriad of shops. Where old meets new would have been a way to describe the clothing that people wore also—some young people wore stiletto heels on knee high boots where some people who could be my grandparents wore the flat shoes and attire that was reserved and modest. Somehow all of them did have a similar purpose for being there—remembrance of their ancestors and the continuation of sending wishes and good will to them in the offerings they made.
no images were found
Dr. Christine Royce notes that there is old, and then there is old. And also “old.” China has all three, and the new as well, in a heady mix.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2010-11-22
When I read The Inquiry Flame, I had a flashback to my methods course. Our introduction to teaching via inquiry was with a candle. This enhanced version shows how teachers can scaffold (or guide) the process to help students design and organize their experiments. The article includes several graphic organizers that could be used in other contexts.
In the Science 2.0 column Instant Inquiry, the author describes the value of studying slow-motion images and directions for using high-speed cameras to create these images as part of student investigations. A useful site on photographic images is Molecular Expressions from the Florida State University. Many of the individual sections are in the SciLinks database already, but the main site shows the extent of the collections.
I know a teacher who uses Headline Science as supplemental readings for students. These brief updates describe what is being learned from current research projects. For many of these topics, there are related SciLinks if students are interested in more information:
Have you been reading this year’s Science & Children? Each issue is themed around aspects of inquiry learning. It’s great to read about what younger students are doing.
Check out the Connections for this issue (November 2010). Even if the article does not quite fit with your lesson agenda, this resource has ideas for handouts, background information sheets, data sheets, rubrics, etc.
By Francis Eberle
Posted on 2010-11-22
no images were found