Skip to main content
 

Conference sessions of great interest to early childhood teachers

By Peggy Ashbrook

Posted on 2011-01-20

Learning about science inquiry through participating in activities at an NSTA conference.

The March 10-13, 2011 National Science Teachers Association’s national conference in San Francisco promises many good sessions for early childhood (preK-2) teachers as well as for the older grades. Take a look at the preliminary schedule on the NSTA conference website and read more about these sessions, just a few of the many offered:
 (HINT: search for keywords such as “childhood”, “preschool”, “primary” and “kindergarten”)
Thursday, March 10
8:00–9:00 AM

  • Budding Scientist

2:00–3:00 PM

  • Newton’s Laws for Preschoolers…Who Knew?!
  • Parents as Partners in a Dual Language After-School Program

3:30–4:30 PM

  • An Online Assessment Tool for Preservice Early Childhood and Elementary Students

Friday, March 11
8:00–11:00 AM

  • SC-10: The Young Scientist: Engaging Three- to Five-Year-Old Children in Science (Ticketed Event)

9:30–10:30 AM

  • Mathematically Rich Preschool Environments as the Foundation for Scientific Inquiry

Teachers engage in science inquiry at a conference session.

Teachers engage in science inquiry at a conference.


11:00 AM–12:00 PM

  • Creating Scientific Drawings and Recordings with Kindergartners
  • NSTA Press Session: Picture-Perfect Science K–4

3:30–4:30 PM

  • Learning, Teaching, and Science Curricula in Preschool Contexts

Saturday, March 12
8:00–9:00 AM

  • BLOCKS Presents: Let’s Talk Dirt!
  • Small Children and Inquiry-based Science: A Reggio Emilia Approach
  • You Can’t Catch ME! I’m the Gingerbread Man! Developing Science-based Units Using Children’s Literature

Teachers learn new ideas for teaching science concepts at conferences.

Learn new ideas for teaching science concepts at conferences.


9:30–10:30 AM

  • Blocks Presents: Little Hands Making Big Moves in Science

11:00 AM–12:00 PM

  • Getting Started with Farm to School Projects: Teaching Across the Curriculum and Fighting Childhood Obesity
  • Young Learners Meet the Scientific Process
  • K–12 Multiculutral Share-a-Thon

2:00–3:00 PM

  • Exuberant Exploration: Creating a Strong Preschool Science Program
  • They Weren’t Teaching Science!

Teachers experience deep thinking at a conference session.

Teachers experience deep thinking at a conference.


3:30–4:30 PM
Notice and Wonder: An Exploration of Inquiry for Preschoolers

  • Science, Technology, and the Northern Ohio and Erie Canal

Sunday, March 13
8:00–9:00 AM

  • Advantages of Open-ended vs. Directed Activities
  • Exploring the Myth of “The” Scientific Method
  • Inside the Body: The View from Grades K–3

Teachers share their expertise in working with young children.

Learn about teaching science to young children from veteran teachers.


9:30–10:30 AM

  • Thinking BIG, Learning BIG: Connecting Science, Math, Literacy, and Language in Early Childhood
  • Using Notebooks to Enhance Science Skills

11:00 AM–12:00 PM

  • Designing Lessons to Impact Environmental Identity Development in Children 
  • The Language of Science: “I See What You Mean”
  • How Do You Engage Minority Families in Science Education?
  • Fight Bac! Integrating Food Safety into Your Elementary Classroom
  • Flutter and Float

Tell us about your best ever conference session, or one that you are presenting at a conference this year. What should we look for in planning our conference schedule?
Peggy

Learning about science inquiry through participating in activities at an NSTA conference.

The March 10-13, 2011 National Science Teachers Association’s national conference in San Francisco promises many good sessions for early childhood (preK-2) teachers as

 

Chemistry Now, week 1: chemistry of water

By admin

Posted on 2011-01-19

In celebration of the International Year of Chemistry, NSTA and NBC Learn have teamed up with the National Science Foundation (NSF) to launch “Chemistry Now,” a weekly, online, video series that uncovers and explains the science of common, physical objects in our world and the changes they undergo every day. The series also looks at the lives and work of scientists on the frontiers of 21st century chemistry.

“Chemistry Now” consists of 32 learning packages that aim to break down the chemistry behind things such as cheeseburgers and chocolate or soap and plastics. NSTA is developing middle and high school lessons to accompany each learning package. A new topic will be explored each week starting in January and running through May. The series will then resume in the fall of 2011 to keep pace with the academic school year, and the series is available cost-free on www.NBCLearn.com and www.NSF.gov.

NSTA will also post portions of each package in this blog, under the Chemistry Now category, and we hope readers will try them out in the classroom and leave comments below each posting about how well the information worked in real-world classrooms. And if you had to make significant changes to a lesson, we’d love to see what you did differently, as well as why you made the changes. Leave a comment, and we’ll get in touch with you with submission information.

Now, to the week one offering, the Chemistry of Water.


 

Victorian era image of fairies as a metaphor for the water molecule

Victorian-era drawing of three fairies holding hands, to depict the number and arrangements of atoms in the water molecule; illustration published in children’s science book “Real Fairy Folks: Explorations in the World of Atoms” by Lucy Rider Meyer (1887). From the collections of the Chemical Heritage Foundation.

Video: “Water: H2O Molecules Made Clear” explains the structure, polarity, cohesive and adhesive properties that makes H2O a chemical essential for life. The video is located at the top right of the collection of resources.

Middle school lesson: the purpose of this lesson is to give students an understanding of water’s density as a liquid and solid.

High school lesson: this lesson will help students understand water’s polarity by examining its Lewis dot structure, discussing the strength of the covalent bonds, and performing a class experiment.

You can use the following form to e-mail us edited versions of the lesson plans:

[contact-form 2 “ChemNow”]

In celebration of the International Year of Chemistry, NSTA and NBC Learn have teamed up with the National Science Foundation (NSF) to launch “Chemistry Now,” a weekly, online, video series that uncovers and explains the science of common, physical objects in our world and the changes they undergo every day. The series also looks at the lives and wor

 

Keyboard science?

By Martin Horejsi

Posted on 2011-01-19

I like to think of science as the process of discovering or creating knowledge. Sure it has many other definitions, but to me, in its most basic form science generates information, and that information is understood and communicated by humans as knowledge.
An engine, on the other hand, is often described as a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion. But further definitions include an engine as something used to effect a purpose or computer software that performs a fundamental function especially of a larger program.
It is this latter definition that was the likely use of naming Wolfram Alpha a “Knowledge Engine.” However, it is the second one, something used to effect a purpose, that I particularly like.
An oldie but a goodie: Wolfram Alpha shows data in a way Google can’t.
Reading the above story about the so-called knowledge engine named Wolfram Alpha (abbreviated W|A), it made me wonder about the pros and cons of of what I like to call recreational data mining.
The classic web search engines of the past decade and a half gave anyone using the net access to a huge number of resources about almost any subject. The read-write web of the past few years allowed one to fill in the gaps with known information thus adding to the overall body of net-based knowledge. Image databases and mapping interfaces further pushed the level of information mashing. But Wolfram Alpha is yet another leap forward.
Having played with W|A on and off since it went live on online, I’ve found it an interesting way to explore subjects, or rather the intersection of subjects. Considering the potential of recreational data mining, it would be interesting to have a place where curious results could be published. The danger, of course, is there might not be a useful or even rational connection between the searched subjects that were forced together possibly against their will. But if science is the creation or discovery of knowledge, then using W|A is, in fact, science.
Like all emerging tech, early adopting educators test-drove the tech then posted their adventures and observations online. W|A is no exception. Here’s a W|A education discussion board: The Education Community Forum for Wolfram Alpha.
Even as science educators get up to speed with W|A, the next generation of products is already on the way. Given Wolfram’s origins within mathematics software, math was the natural place to start, but science topics are on the list as well. What am I talking about? Why Wolfram Course Assistant Apps of course.
But like many of our digital dilemmas—including spell check, electronic calculators, digital balances, GPS, and GO-TO telescopes—that all rudely displaced their ancestors, questions arose that directly addressed the very nature of why we do what we do. For instance: Wolfram education apps raise teaching dilemma.
Another definition of an engine is “something that produces a particular and usually desirable result.” Hopefully the future of relational databases will pursue this definition as well. But alas, there is yet another definition for engine, and although an obsolete usage of the word, its etymology might be something to keep in mind—“engine: a torture implement.”

I like to think of science as the process of discovering or creating knowledge. Sure it has many other definitions, but to me, in its most basic form science generates information, and that information is understood and communicated by humans as knowledge.
An engine, on the other hand, is often described as a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion. But further definitions include an engine as something used to effect a purpose or computer software that performs a fundamental function especially of a larger program.

 

Importance of teaching science in early childhood promoted by NSTA President Alan McCormack

By Peggy Ashbrook

Posted on 2011-01-18

Young children in science activity.Use of science tools can begin in early childhood.For any who did not get a chance to read the wonderfully supportive statement by the National Science Teachers Association president, Alan McCormack in the 12/7/10 NSTA Reports It’s Time for More Early Childhood Science, take a look and then make a copy for your director, principal, and superintendant. You might want to post it or quote from it in a note home to your students’ families. Let them know that it is not only early childhood educators who believe that “We need to help kids begin their magnificent journey into science as early in life as possible.” Teachers in middle and high school want their students to come to class having had many experiences with the natural world.

Young children in science activity.Use of science tools can begin in early childhood.For any who did not get a chance to read the wonderfully supportive statement by the National S

 

Assessment

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2011-01-16

Click here for the Table of Contents


Several years ago, I did a series of workshops entitled “What’s in Your Assessment Toolkit?” so I appreciated both the cover and the theme of this month’s issue of Science Scope. Whatever vocabulary we use (assessment, test, exam, etc) the purpose, according to the editor, is the same: to determine what students know before a lesson starts, to monitor if they are “getting it” as the lesson unfolds, and to measure what they have mastered at the end of instruction.
A professor of mine once said “If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.” Having a variety of tools in our toolkits helps us to use different ways to determine what students are learning.

At the beginning of a lesson or unit, pre-assessments often uncover student misconceptions. A Different Spin on Coriolis: Applying Frame of Reference describes common misconceptions about the Coriolis Effect and includes several activities to help students understand the concept better. (A teacher-created video on frame of reference was recently shared in the NSTA listserves) (SciLinks: Coriolis Effect)
We all want our students to perform high-level tasks, but students may not have the prerequisite skills. Deconstructing to Instruct shows how a teacher broke down the tasks she was asking students to perform into chunks of knowledge and skills and then provided appropriate instruction in the missing pieces (such as compare/contrast or interpreting a data table). There are examples of how the author structures her assessment to learn where students need additional instruction.
Using Formative and Alternative Assessments to Support Instruction and Measure Student Learning is a mouthful of a title!  But then again, this article has lots of ideas. The author describes her journey in helping students learn through using a variety of assessments. She incorporates formative assessment (ungraded) into bellringers and pretests, and she also uses lab reports to identify misconceptions and learning gaps. There is also a discussion of differentiating assessments, including examples and rubrics.
If it’s science fair time in your school (and science projects can be a form of summative assessment), see the article Putting the Science Back in the Science Fair, which focuses on a challenging component: finding researchable questions (this topic is also the theme of the December 2010 issue of Science and Children). The article includes a rubric for science projects. (SciLinks: Science Fair)
Students (and adults!) have many misconceptions about the phases of the moon. But changing these misconceptions requires more than just telling people the correct information. A High-Stakes-Test Intervention shows how teachers used engaging, hands-on activities that were purposefully designed to improve students understanding. The authors include instructions (based on the 5E model), examples of student work, and samples of assessment questions. (SciLinks: Moon Phases)
SciLinks also has resources related to the science content of several articles:

Click here for the Table of Contents

 

A global online science fair?

By Martin Horejsi

Posted on 2011-01-13

I was just reading about Google’s Global Online Science Fair. My first thought was why didn’t I think of that? But even if I had, it would have been mere seconds considering the scale of such a thing to squash any chance of mustering the necessary resources and financial backing.
While there are many upsides to a face-to-face science fair, the potential for an archived, digital, global presentation has some tremendous advantages for giving the projects life beyond the trifold.
Students aged from 13–18 from around the world are encouraged to submit their entries between now and April 4. Having judged more than my share of science fairs, I can only imagine the logistics of something of this magnitude. In fact, it would take a company like Google along with its friends in high places to pull it off with the grace and dignity the students deserve.
But on a side note, think for a moment about the spinoffs including the scope of projects, the communication (There are several blogs), the rubbing digital shoulders with famous scientists, and the career potential.
The unfolding of this science fair will really be something to watch.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7oJfK4E7RY[/youtube]

I was just reading about Google’s Global Online Science Fair. My first thought was why didn’t I think of that? But even if I had, it would have been mere seconds considering the scale of such a thing to squash any chance of mustering the necessary resources and financial backing.
While there are many upsides to a face-to-face science fair, the potential for an archived, digital, global presentation has some tremendous advantages for giving the projects life beyond the trifold.

 

Data collection in early childhood

By Peggy Ashbrook

Posted on 2011-01-12

Cover of January 2011 NSTA journal, Science and ChildrenThe January 2011 issue of Science and Children focuses on collecting data. In the Early Years column I wrote that “Young children collect data every day. They note who has pink sparkly shoes and find out who will share the ball on the playground. Children will be interested in collecting data if the topic is important to them, such as recording their favorite color.”
Data collection is an important part of science inquiry. Here are some examples of data collection methods for science investigations by young children:

chart

Chart to compare which rolled down the ramp fastest: a marble, a wiffle ball or a plastic egg.


Tally chart

Tally chart counting up the class’s favorite of four smells.


Drawing of experimental set up.

Drawing to record the set up for an experiment.


Drawing observations of the results.

Drawing observations as the experiment progresses.


Photograph of rain gauge results.

Using photographs to record amount of rain in rain gauge.


Drawing of caterpillar.

Making drawings of a caterpillar as it grows.


Graphing favorite rainbow colors with squares of paper.

Children graphing their favorite rainbow colors, described in Marie Faust Evitt’s comment below.


Once your students have collected data, what do you do with it?
Hold a conversation with a few students or a discussion with the entire class about any patterns they see; anything they notice in the representation of their observations, and any new questions they might have. Have your students write or dictate their thoughts.
Share the data collection methods your students have used and how they have supported student understanding by commenting below.
Peggy

Cover of January 2011 NSTA journal, Science and ChildrenThe January 2011 issue of Science and Children focuses on collecting data. In the Early Years column I wrote that “Young children collect data every day. They note who has pink sparkly shoes and find out who will share the ball on the playground.

 

Planning a field trip

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2011-01-12

Every spring, our fourth grade does a one-day field trip. The teacher who usually planned the event retired, and I was asked to take over. We’d like to visit a science-related venue this year, but I’ve never organized an event like this.
—Isaiah, Bakersfield, California
Field trips require a lot of planning and organization, but they can be wonderful opportunities for students to have experiences beyond the classroom. You can reinforce or expand on topics and stimulate student interest. It’s interesting to see how students respond to a different learning environment—standing beside a dinosaur skeleton or seeing the ocean for the first time.
What learning goals do you have for the trip? That will help you determine an appropriate science-related destination such as a museum, zoo, aquarium, nature center, or park. If possible, contact your former colleague; she may still have an archive of resources. Ask other teachers who were involved for any input or insights and enlist their assistance. In an era of tight budgets, decide with your colleagues on how far to travel, keeping in mind you could stay close to home and still provide a worthwhile experience.

Ask your principal about school district guidelines for field trips (including templates for permissions slips or release forms) and if you need formal permission from the school board. If so, you’ll need many details ironed-out in advance. Find out if you’re limited to the normal school hours, or if you can leave earlier or return later for a longer experience. Is there a preferred transportation company? Discuss a tentative budget for the trip. Who will pay the transportation costs and entry fees? If individual students are responsible, is there a fund for students who cannot afford the costs? If students on the trip require medications, how should that be handled? Work with the principal to select a date that does not conflict with other events. Determine a contingency plan for inclement weather. If students do remain behind, who will supervise them? What will they do?
After you determine the purpose of your trip and your time frame, visit some possibilities or talk to others who have been there. Is the site appropriate for your grade level? What group facilities are available: meeting rooms, lunch facilities, restrooms, bus parking, handicapped accessibility? Check out the venue’s website or talk to the education coordinator. Do you need to make a reservation? What are their requirements for the group, in terms of adult to student ratio or student attire? They may have resources for student activities or docents/guides to assist your group.
Prepare your students (and parents) for the trip. In addition to the details on the permission slip, provide a handout detailing the location, purpose of the trip, and suggestions for what students need (e.g., lunch, attire for safety and comfort) and what kind of “stuff” students are allowed to bring (e.g., electronics, reading material, cell phones, cameras). Include photos if possible to help generate excitement.
You may need to recruit additional chaperones, especially for a crowded venue such as a zoo or museum. If parents volunteer, do they need to provide clearances or background checks? If possible, have a meeting prior to the trip to go over your expectations and the chaperones’ responsibilities.
In some school groups, the students wear the same color shirt, a school jacket or hat, or a colorful lanyard to identify them. Give chaperones packets with student groups, the names of students in each group, a brief description of the planned activities, your cell phone number and those of other chaperones, and maps showing the location of bus pickup, restrooms, and lunch. Instruct them to count students often, especially before leaving a site. Consider asking one teacher to be a roving chaperone with the student information forms, on call to assist a group that is having problems (my former principal often took on this role). He or she could also take pictures of students doing various activities on the trip.

The logistics will take a lot of effort, but don’t overlook the purpose of the trip: What activities will help students meet the learning goals? Some venues provide guides with planned tours, and their websites may have suggested activities for groups on their own. One common activity is a “scavenger hunt” in which students find specific items. But I’ve seen students racing through a venue just to check off things they see, so any activity should be focused on your learning goals. Perhaps pairs or groups of students could come up with their own questions to explore on their visit. Students could take sketchbooks or notebooks to record their findings, index cards to make their own “postcards,” cameras (if allowed), or pages of a class scrapbook to work on.

After the trip, debrief with the students on the activities they did and continue with any follow-up. Have the students send thank-you notes to the chaperones. Send a note to the venue with feedback from the students and chaperones.  Display photographs and student quotes on your bulletin board. Annotate your notes with ideas for next year.
Many times when I see former students, they comment on the field trips we took. Whether the experience was a half-day at a nearby park or a three-day oceanography trip, their memories made it worth the effort.
Examples of guidelines and resources:

Every spring, our fourth grade does a one-day field trip. The teacher who usually planned the event retired, and I was asked to take over. We’d like to visit a science-related venue this year, but I’ve never organized an event like this.
—Isaiah, Bakersfield, California

 

Getting to the root of STEM

By Francis Eberle

Posted on 2011-01-11

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle


For the last few years I have been conducting my own investigation into the increased interest and expansion of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in rhetoric, legislation, institutional structures, programs, and materials.
What has intrigued me is the way STEM is used as an acronym for the separate subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), or as topics within each of the four subjects (such as biotechnology). Often the acronym is used to depict only one of the four subjects, two of more of the subjects, or some type of an integrated combination of two or more of these four subjects. (I am using the term subjects here to describe STEM, rather than calling them disciplines, because there are some who say that technology and engineering are not disciplines. More explanation is probably warranted for this statement, but I am not going to do this in this post.)
The more variation I found in how STEM was being used, the more curious I became about what this would look like in districts, schools, and classrooms. There are, of course, traditional schools teaching science, technology, maybe engineering, and mathematics separately. There are “STEM” schools where the learning seems to be different from what is provided in existing science and mathematics schools.
There are STEM networks, STEM centers, STEM departments, and STEM teachers. There are STEM programs and STEM instructional materials.
Can you help me in my investigation? How is STEM being implemented in your district, school, or classroom? What do you think should be the learning opportunities in STEM subjects for students?

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

NSTA Executive Director Francis Eberle

 

Student-produced videos

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2011-01-06

As part of the quest to find relevant resources for SciLinks topics, I’ve been poking around YouTube, TeacherTube, and other video sites. I’ve certainly seen the good (which are considered for a SciLinks review), the bad (poor design or lots of errors), the ugly (talking-head lectures)—and the inappropriate.
I really enjoy looking at the student-produced ones. I’m amazed by the creativity of our students and their ability to use the video technology. I suspect that many of them learned the skills on their own, but you can tell those that have had some teacher guidance, especially in the science content. Teachers often lament that students “don’t want to learn,” but seeing what some students can do with a challenging and relevant task makes me wonder about that.
Publishing student work online is a win-win situation. The “producer” learns and integrates content and media skills into a product that “consumers” (other students) can learn from. The teacher can work with the producer to make sure that the information is correct and that the product is appropriate for the intended audience. For example, I was recently made aware of an animated video created by a Florida high school student for a middle school audience: Prepare for the Science Fair by Kevin Temmer. This could be a light-hearted and  engaging introduction for younger students to what could be an imposing task. (You might have a teachable moment here to clarify the word “hypothesis.” The video uses the terms “educated guess” and “prediction” which may differ from your definition.)
Of course, it’s ironic that in many schools, video sites are blocked, as are blogs (including the NSTA ones), wikis, and social media sites. I know some teachers who created a Ning site to share resources and information related to a science professional development project, but they have to use it at home! I can understand that schools don’t want students accessing inappropriate material, why are teachers denied access to teaching tools and instructional resources that could enhance student learning? Hmm.

As part of the quest to find relevant resources for SciLinks topics, I’ve been poking around YouTube, TeacherTube, and other video sites. I’ve certainly seen the good (which are considered for a SciLinks review), the bad (poor design or lots of errors), the ugly (talking-head lectures)—and the inappropriate.

Subscribe to
Asset 2